HOUSING SUPPORT POLICIES IN PANDEMIC TIMES AND INTERRELATIONS WITH INSTITUTIONAL TRUST: A MIXED-METHODS APPROACH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4113-0664
Abstract
Housing was crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic, as “staying at home” was the first line of defense against the virus. To reduce the economic downturn’s impact on housing security, preventive and supportive measures were developed, such as moratoria on rents and mortgages. This paper aims to analyze the opinions of tenants and indebted homeowners about the housing support policies implemented during the pandemic crisis and explore the relation with the level of trust in institutions — an aspect not yet studied. A mixed-methods approach is used based on quantitative and qualitative data from a nationwide online survey conducted in 2021. Quantitative data was analyzed using the software SPSS, and qualitative data was analyzed through thematic analysis. Thematic analysis of 377 answers to open questions (e.g., “What is your opinion on the exceptional financial regime for payment of rents?”) shows that homeowners’ opinions (positive or negative) are mainly supported by their perceptions of the effectiveness of measures introduced to protect families from economic shocks resulting from the pandemic. For tenants, besides effectiveness, opinions are also determined by evaluation of the quality-of-service delivery and responsiveness. Variance analysis shows that tenants with a positive opinion tend to present higher levels of trust in public institutions compared to those with an unfavorable opinion. The study shows that housing support measures during COVID-19 in Portugal were met with mixed trust levels, with positive views linked to higher institutional trust and negative perceptions tied to concerns over fairness, efficiency, and long-term impacts. It concludes by emphasizing the importance of effective policy design and implementation in times of crisis and the psychosocial consequences of not achieving envisioned aims.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Adu, J., Owusu, M. F., Martin-Yeboah, E., Pino Gavidia, L. A., & Gyamfi, S. (2022). A discussion of some controversies in mixed methods research for emerging researchers. Methodological Innovations, 15(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221123398
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Banco de Portugal (2021). Relatório de supervisão comportamental 2020. https://www.bportugal.pt/sites/default/files/anexos/pdf-boletim/rsc_2020_pt.pdf
Bushman, G., & Mehdipanah, R. (2022). Housing and health inequities during COVID-19: Findings from the national household pulse survey. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 76(2), 121–127.
Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2020). Exploring trust, mistrust and distrust. https://trustgov.net/working-papers
Diário de Notícias. (2020, April 24). Portugueses pediram 860 mil euros para ajudar a pagar a renda [Portuguese people asked for 860 thousand euros to help pay rent]. https://www.dn.pt/poder/portugueses-pediram-860-mil-euros-para-ajudar-a-pagar-a-renda-12111654.html
Donoghue, J., & Tranter, B. (2012). Social capital, interpersonal trust, and public housing. Australian Social Work, 65(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.635306
European Commission. (2021). The EU and the coronavirus pandemic. Standard Eurobarometer 95 Spring 2021. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2532
Farha, L. (2020). COVID-19 guidance note: Protecting renters and mortgage payers. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/SR_housing_COVID-19_guidance_rent_and_mortgage_payers.pdf.
Frade, C., Santos, A.C., & Teles, N. (2021). A moratória de crédito a empresas e famílias: alívio presente, riscos financeiros futuros [The credit moratorium for companies and families: current relief, future financial risks]. Barómetro das Crises, 23, 1–19.
Gomes, M. (2020, December 30). Maioria dos portugueses satisfeita com o Governo pela forma como gere a pandemia [Most Portuguese people satisfied with the Government for the way it manages the pandemic]. Público. https://www.publico.pt/2020/12/30/politica/noticia/maioria-portugueses-satisfeitos-governo-forma-gere-pandemia-1944604
Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010). What to do about missing values in time series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
Keller, A., Groot, J., Matta, J., Bu, F., El Aarbaoui, T., Melchior, M., Fancourt, D., Zins, M., Goldberg, M., Nybo Andersen, A.M., Rod, N.H., Strandberg-Larsen, K., & Varga, T.V. (2022). Housing environment and mental health of Europeans during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country comparison. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5612. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09316-4
Lee, S. (2022). Subjective well-being and mental health during the pandemic outbreak: Exploring the role of institutional trust. Research on Aging, 44(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520975145
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
Li, A., Baker, E., & Bentley, R. (2024). Housing and mental health inequalities during COVID-19: The role of income and housing support measures. Housing Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2024.2366961
Lima, V. (2024). Pandemic housing policies: Mitigation strategies and protection of rights. Housing and Society, 51(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2023.2266307
LimeSurvey GmbH. (2021). LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. LimeSurvey GmbH. http://www.limesurvey.org
Melo, C. (2020, June 25). Bancos já receberam mais de 780 mil pedidos de moratórias. Aprovaram 88% [Banks have already received more than 780,000 requests for moratoriums. 88% have been approved]. ECO. https://eco.sapo.pt/2020/06/25/bancos-ja-receberam-mais-de-780-mil-pedidos-de-moratorias-aprovaram-88/
Pereira, S. M., & Matos, M. (coord.) (2020). Relatório habitação e covid-19 [Housing and Covid-19 report]. https://4151a5c8-348c-441f-9545-a7bec6c67a9e.usrfiles.com/ugd/4151a5_f084f419db2140d1a8493016a37e5e46.pdf
Provedor de Justiça. (2021). Relatório à Assembleia da República – 2020 [Report to the Assembly of the Republic – 2020]. https://www.provedor-jus.pt/documentos/relatorio-a-assembleia-da-republica-2020-provedor-de-justica/
Ribeiro, R. (2021a). A(s) casa(s) e o "ficar em casa": Um estudo exploratório dos impactos psicossociais das desigualdades habitacionais na vivência da pandemia da Covid-19 [Home(S) and “staying at home”: An exploratory study of the psychosocial impacts of housing inequalities during the Covid-19 pandemic]. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 9, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.153-162
Ribeiro, R. (2021b, July 11-13). When housing policies fail to attain expectations: Complaints regarding Covid-19 moratoriums on housing rents and mortgage loans in Portugal [Conference session]. 2021 International Society of Political Psychology Annual Meeting, Virtual (Online).
Ribeiro, R. (Org.). (2023). Lar (agri)doce lar: Representações sociais da habitação no Portugal do século XXI e seus impactos psicossociais [Home (bitter)sweet Home: Social representations of housing in 21st century Portugal and its psychosocial impacts]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Sociais. https://hdl.handle.net/10316/115262
Ribeiro, R., Santos, A. C., Poeschl, G., Fernanda, J., Coelho, L., Campos, R., Silva, R., Holz, S., & Castela, T. (2021, April 23). Pandemia da Covid-19 e habitação: Resultados preliminares [Covid-19 pandemic and housing: Preliminary results]. [Paper presentation]. Dia do NECES, Virtual (Online).
Ribeiro, R., Santos, A. C., & Poeschl, G. (in press). ‘Tell me how you live and I’ll tell you who you trust’: Exploration of the housing determinants of trust in Portugal. Portuguese Journal of Social Science.
Sánchez-Gomez, M. C., Martín-Cilleros, M. V., Sá, P., & Costa, A. P. (2020). Reflexiones en torno a la investigación con métodos mixtos. Revista Baiana de Enfermagem, 34:e31851
Santos, A. C., Teles, N., Frade, C., & Ribeiro, R. (2022). A financeirização na área metropolitana de Lisboa: da crise financeira à crise habitacional [Financialization in the Lisbon metropolitan area: From the financial crisis to the housing crisis]. In A. Drago (org.), A segunda crise de Lisboa: uma metrópole fragilizada (pp. 124-158). Actual.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Sage.
Tribunal de Contas. (2021). Reação ao impacto adverso da pandemia no setor da habitação [Response to the adverse impact of the pandemic on the housing sector]. https://www.tcontas.pt/pt-pt/MenuSecundario/Noticias/Pages/n20211119-1.aspx
United Nations. (2020). Organização Mundial da Saúde declara novo coronavírus uma pandemia [World Health Organization declares novel coronavirus a pandemic]. https://news.un.org/pt/story/2020/03/1706881
United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Policy brief: Trust in public institutions. https://www.undp.org/oslo-governance-centre/publications/policy-brief-trust-public-institutions
Uslaner, E. M. (2009). Trust, diversity, and segregation. Working Paper Series, University of Maryland. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1523721
World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e1e22749-80c3-50ea-b7e1-8bc332d0c2ff/content
Zhu, Y. & Holden, M. (2023). Housing and psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Habitat International, 135, 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102812.