INTER-COLLABORATIVE NURSING SUPERVISION PROCESS BETWEEN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT MODELS AND ACADEMIA: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction: Organizational management models influence supervisory activity in nursing. Collaborative practice between students and health professionals in the provision of person- and family-centred care allows them to evolve in the process of autonomy and knowledge transfer. However, this does not guarantee the acquisition of supervisory practices and inter-organisational interaction between the hospital and the academy, which are necessary for carrying out safe and qualified clinical procedures. However, this does not guarantee efficient acquisition of supervisory practices and inter-organizational interaction between hospital and academia, which are necessary to provide safe and effective clinical procedures. Objectives: The aim is to understand the possible dimensions of inter-organisational collaborative practice (academic and hospital), identifying its possible processes and results capable of guaranteeing the safety and quality of clinical procedures. Methods: This study emerges from a first mixed research intervention with N=50 nurse supervisors, non-randomized, using the snowball technique. We will, nevertheless, focus on its qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive approach, using the Focus Group technique in which seven nurse supervisors took part. By using Bardin's assumptions, we conducted the content analysis of the participants' speech. Results: The content analysis allowed us to recognise the Processes of Inter-Collaborative Supervision in Nursing as the main dimension of analysis. The results identify, on the one hand, potential threats, highlighted by the time dedicated to supervision and access to information in the hospital context and, on the other hand, opportunities for articulation, highlighted by the importance of involving the various actors in each context, both in planning training programmes and in using supervisory strategies. Conclusion: This study explores the collaborative processes of nursing supervision between academia and hospitals, highlighting common elements of care and education. It reveals the influence of both bureaucratic and anarchic models in shaping these relationships. The findings underscore the importance of inter-organizational coordination, which plays a critical role in effective health promotion practices.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Alarcão, I., & Canha, B. (2013). Supervisão e Colaboração-Uma Relação para o desenvolvimento. Porto Editora.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Barnard C. (1971). As funções do executivo. Atlas.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). The European sustainability competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union.
Brunsson, N. (2006). A organização da hipocrisia – os grupos em acção: dialogar, decidir e agir. Asa.
Chaves, L.D., Mininel, V.A., Silva, J., A. M., Alves, L.R., Silva, M.F., & Camelo, S.H.H. (2017). Nursing supervision for care comprehensiveness. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet], 70(5), 1106-11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0491
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1977). A garbage can model of organization choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2023). Referencial para a Inovação Pedagógica nas Escolas; Conselho Nacional de Educação.
Ellström, P. (1983). Four faces of educational organizations. Higher education, 12, 231-241. https://doi:10.1007/BF0013663913.
Fox, N. J. (1999). Os tempos dos Cuidados de Saúde. Poder, Controlo e Resistência. Sociologia – Prob e Prátics, 29, 9-29.
Fox, N. J. (1991). Postmodernism, Rationality, and the Evaluation of Health Care. Sociol. Revie., 39(4), 709-44.
Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: working together for a better future. J. Chiropr. Educ., 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7899/JCE-14-36.
Harris, B. (2002). Paradigmas e parâmetros da supervisão em educação. Em A Supervisão na Formação de Professores; Júlia, O. F. (org.), pp. 133-223. Porto Editora.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 4th ed. Sage.
Macedo, A. P. (2012). Supervisão em enfermagem. Construir as interfaces entre a escola e o hospital. Defacto Editores.
Macedo, A.P. (2011). A Supervisão de Estágio como Analisador da Articulação Interorganizacional Escola de Enfermagem e Hospital. Rev Port Educa, 24(2), 81-110.
Macedo, A.P. (2013). A supervisão de estágios em enfermagem: entre a escola e o hospital. R. Enferm. Ref., 11, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIII1304.
Morgan, D. (1996). Focus groups. A. Revie. Sociol., 22, 129-152. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
Noyes, A.L. (2022). Navigating the Hierarchy: Communicating Power Relationships in Collaborative Health Care Groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(1), 62-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211025737
Ordem dos Enfermeiros. Regulamento de Acreditação e Creditação de Atividades Formativas. Diário da República, 2.ª série — N.º 215 — 8 de novembro, 2017. Available online: https://www.ordemenfermeiros.pt/media/8740/regulamento-2017_557-acredita%C3%A7%C3%A3o-e-credita%C3%A7%C3%A3o-de-atividades-formativas_.pdf (acessing on 6 March 2024).
Palumbo, R., Mohammad, F., Manesh, M. M. P., & Giulia F. (2020). Exploring inter-organisational relationships in healthcare: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Administrative Sciences 10(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030057
Rouhi-Balasi, L., Elahi, N., Ebadi, A., Jahani, S., & Hazrati, M. (2020). Professional Autonomy of Nurses: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis Study. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research, 25(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_213_19.
Saunders B., Sim J., Kingstone T., Baker S., Waterfield J., Bartlam B., Burroughs H., & Jinks C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant., 52(4), 1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
Seaton, C. L., Holm, N., Bottorff, J. L., Jones-Bricker, M., Errey, S., Caperchione, C. M., Lamont, S., Johnson, S. T., & Healy, T. (2018). Factors That Impact the Success of Interorganizational Health Promotion Collaborations: A Scoping Review. American journal of health promotion: AJHP, 32(4), 1095–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117710875
Souza, L. K. (2020). Recomendações para a Realização de Grupos Focais na Pesquisa Qualitativa. PSI UNISC, 4(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.17058/psiunisc.v4i1.13500.
Tanner, D., &Tanner, L. (1987). Supervision in Education: Problems and Practices. Macmillan.
Tyler, W. (1991). Organizacion Escolar. Una perspectiva sociológica. Morata.
van Dale, D., Lemmens, L., Hendriksen, M., Savolainen, N., Nagy, P., Marosi, E., Eigenmann, M., Stegemann, I., & Rogers, H. L. (2020). Recommendations for Effective Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion Interventions: Results from Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS Work Package 5 Activities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(18), 6474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186474
Vieira, F. (2006). Formação reflexiva de professores e pedagogia para a autonomia: para a constituição de um quadro ético e conceptual da supervisão. Em Vieira, F. et al. (Eds), No caleidoscópio da supervisão: imagens da formação e da pedagogia. Pedago.
Weber, M. (1976). Características da burocracia. In Vários, A Burocracia. Sociocultur.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Admin. Scien. Quart., 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875.