IMPLEMENTING QUALI EVIDENCE - A CHALLENGE FOR EVIDENCE ECOSYSTEMS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8126-765X
Luis Sousa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-5690
Rogério Ferreira
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-2036
Marcelle Miranda da Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-7252
Cristina Baixinho
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-1732
Abstract
Introduction Translating knowledge into clinical health contexts faces complex challenges, and research results take time to influence health policies and interventions. The World Health Organization, aware of the need to develop clinical evidence ecosystems, has made a series of recommendations; Goals: This article aims to answer the question: 'What are the contributions of qualitative research to the development of evidence ecosystems in clinical healthcare? Methods: Based on a review of the literature and the authors' experience (with qualitative research and knowledge translation), the aim is to explore the advantages of qualitative research, the importance of its application in person-centered care and the development of evidence ecosystems. Results: A differentiated view of research and knowledge translation models contributes to the development of evidence ecosystems, where from the design of the study to the use of research results there is co-construction by the different actors in the process: citizens, health professionals, managers, and policy makers. Conclusions: Qualitative research allows for centered care, the design of interventions that take into account the preferences and beliefs of the person, contributing to evidence-based practice and the development of evidence ecosystems.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Agostinho, I., Reis, N., Sousa, L., Ferreira, R., Silva, M.M. & Baixinho, C.L. (2023). Qualitative Research and the Design of Health Interventions. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 18, e857. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.18.2023.e857
Apóstolo, J. (2017). Síntese da evidência no contexto da translação da ciência. Coimbra, Portugal: Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (ESEnfC).
Apóstolo, J. L., & Silva, R. C. (2021). Ciência cidadã e aberta em tempos de pandemia!. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 5(Supl. 8), e21EDS8. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21EDS8
Baixinho, C.L., & Costa, A.P. (2020). Researchers’ Scientific Credibility and Knowledge Transfer. Esc Anna Nery; 24(3):e20200008. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2020-0008
Baixinho C.L., Ferreira Ó., Marques F.M., Presado M.H., & Cardoso M. (2017). Transição segura: um projeto da translação do conhecimento para a prática clínica. In: Costa AP, Sánches-Gómez MC, Cilleros MV M. A prática na Investigação Qualitativa: exemplos de estudos. Oliveira de Azeméis: Ludomédia, pp.57-80
Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, Ó., Marques F.M., Oliveira, E., Presado M.H., Cardoso M., Sousa, A., & Nascimento T. (2022). Síntese, transferência e implementação de evidência qualitativa para a melhoria das práticas e da decisão clínica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 13. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e568
Baumbusch, J.L., Kirkham, S.R., Khan, K.B., McDonald, H., Semeniuk, P., Tan, E., & Anderson, J.M. (2008). Pursuing Common Agendas: A Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation between Research and Practice in Clinical Settings. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 130–40. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20242
Cardoso, M., Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, O., Nascimento, P., Pedrosa, R., Gonçalves, P. (2021). Learning evidence based practice through involvement in investigation activities - the self-perception of students. Cogit. Enferm. 26:e79806. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v26i0.79806
Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
Epstein, R. M., Duberstein, P. R., Fenton, J. J., Fiscella, K., Hoerger, M., Tancredi, D. J., Xing, G., Gramling, R., Mohile, S., Franks, P., Kaesberg, P., Plumb, S., Cipri, C. S., Street, R. L., Jr, Shields, C. G., Back, A. L., Butow, P., Walczak, A., Tattersall, M., Venuti, A., … Kravitz, R. L. (2017). Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology, 3(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4373
Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof.;26(1):13-24. http://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Hoddinott, P., Pollock, A., O'Cathain, A., Boyer, I., Taylor, J., MacDonald, C., Oliver, S., & Donovan, J. L. (2018). How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Research, 7, 752. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15162.1
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European journal of general practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Loura, D. S., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2021). Nursing students' learning from involvement in research projects: an integrative literature review. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 75(1), e20210053. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Muller, I., Santer, M., Morrison, L., Morton, K., Roberts, A., Rice, C., Williams, M., & Yardley, L. (2019). Combining qualitative research with PPI: reflections on using the person-based approach for developing behavioural interventions. Research involvement and engagement, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0169-8
O'Cathain, A., Croot, L., Duncan, E., Rousseau, N., Sworn, K., Turner, K. M., Yardley, L., & Hoddinott, P. (2019). Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ open, 9(8), e029954. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954
Presado, M.H., Baixinho, C.L., & Oliveira, E.S.F. (2021). Qualitative research in pandemic times. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74(suppl 1):e74Suppl101. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.202174Suppl101.
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Prihodova, L., Guerin, S., Tunney, C., & Kernohan, W.G. (2019). Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13836
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International journal of preventive medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19
Thirsk, L. M., & Clark, A. M. (2017). Using Qualitative Research for Complex Interventions: The Contributions of Hermeneutics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917721068
World Health Organization (2021). Evidence, policy, impact. WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yardley, L., Bradbury, K., & Morrison, L. (2021). Using qualitative research for intervention development and evaluation. In P. M. Camic (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed., pp. 263–282). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-013