Introducing the C.O.S.T.A Postgraduate Research Coaching Model - A Complementary Approach to Supervision

Autores

  • King Costa Global Centre for Academic Research - South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.1.2020.171-185

Palavras-chave:

Research Supervision, Postgraduate Research, Higher Education, Coaching;

Resumo

Postgraduate research is a massive stumbling block to students who have never had an opportunity of exposure to research methods. A recent study revealed challenges in postgraduate supervision—one of these challenges was students’ lack of exposure to research language (Costa, 2018). Qualitative research and its complexities, due to a variety of approaches including rigor determination, pose a plethora of challenges to novice researchers. This document presents the C.O.S.T.A model as a tool suitable for use by academics and students, with a panoramic view of steps to be taken; first to understand foundational concepts and the language of research, and second to make informed choices on the research methods and design strategy options available for the prospective researcher. Conclusions drawn on the reliability of the model are based on observation of a group of postgraduate students who were part of the first cohort at the Global Centre for Academic Research in 2018, with some students testifying to have passed their research projects satisfactorily at their respective leading universities in South Africa.

Referências

Abramo, G. & D’Angelo, C. (2014). How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics, 101(2), 1129-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8

Baptista, A. (2011). Challenges to doctoral research and supervision quality: A theoretical approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3576–3581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.338.

Belcher, D. & Hirvela, A. (2005). Writing the qualitative dissertation: What motivates and sustains commitment to a fuzzy genre? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.010

Beutler, L. & Howard, K. (1998). Clinical utility research: an introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199804)54:3<297::aid-jclp1>3.0.co;2-n

Bock, E. (2013). Research supervision needs and experiences of master’s students in nursing [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Stellenbosch University.

Bopape, A. M. (2018). Factors influencing the through-put rates of master's students at the University of Limpopo [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Limpopo.

Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. Sage.

Cekiso, M., Tshotsho, B., Masha, R., & Saziwa, T. (2019). Supervision experiences of postgraduate research at one South African higher education institution. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(3), 8?25. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-2913

Chubb, I. (2013, February 1). Productivity, industry engagement and the PhD workforce [Keynote address]. AMSI Accelerate Australia Conference, Melbourne. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2013/02/productivity-industry-engagement-and-the-phd-workforce

Costa, K. (2018). A Systematic Review of Challenges in Research Supervision at South African Universities. Preprints, 2018, 1-45. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201812.0305.v1.

Cranfield, D., & Taylor, J. (2008). Knowledge management and higher education: A UK case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(6), 85–100. http://www.ejkm.com/main.html

Creswell, J., & Miller, D. (2002). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice. Theory into Practice 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

Disney, T., Harowell, E., Mulhall, R., & Ronayne, M. (2013). Doctoral researcher skill development: learning through doing. Planet, 27(2), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2013.00004

Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., & Anzul, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. The Falmer Press.

Global Centre for Academic Research. (2018, December). G-CAR Scholars share their experiences. https://www.vleresearch.net

Goodall, A., Dowell, M., & Singell, L. (2014). Leadership and the research productivity of university departments. Institute for the Study of Labor. https://ftp.iza.org/dp7903.pdf

Govender, K., & Dhunpath, R. (2011). Student experiences of the PhD cohort model: working within or outside communities of practice? Perspectives in Education, 29(1), 88-99. https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/169

Ives, Y. (2008). What is ‘coaching’? An exploration of conflicting paradigms. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 100-113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253147470_What_is_'Coaching'_An_Exploration_of_Conflicting_Paradigms

Keane, M. (2016). Coaching interventions for postgraduate supervision courses: Promoting equity and understanding in the supervisor-student relationship. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(6), 94?111. https://www.doi.org/10.20853/30-6-720

Knowles, M. (1984). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Gulf Publishing.

Kotterman, J. (2006). Leadership versus management: What’s the difference? Journal for Quality and Participation, 29(2), 13–17. https://search.proquest.com/openview/9e519b2df53655fd0f5f39c35480c1ac/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=37083

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision.” Studies in Higher Education, 33(3): 267–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202

Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design. Prentice Hall.

Lessing, N., & Lessing, A. (2004). The supervision of research for dissertations. Acta Commercii, 4, 73–87.

Lubb, S., Worrall, L., & Klopper, R. (2005). Challenges in postgraduate research: How doctorates come off the rails. Alternation, 12(1a), 241-262. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA10231757_443

Maxwell, T., & Smyth, R. (2010). Research supervision: The research management matrix. Higher Education, 59(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9256-3

Mdyogolo, W. (2012). The academic experiences of faculty of education postgraduate students who have dropped out of a higher education institution in Eastern Cape Province. University of Fort Hare.

Medway, P. (2002). Fuzzy genres and community identities: The case of architecture students’ sketchbooks. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 123-153). Hampton Press.

Morgan, M., & Rochford, S. (2017). Coaching and mentoring for frontline practitioners. Centre for Effective Services.

Mutula, S. (2009). Challenges of postgraduate research: a global context, African perspectives [Conference presentation]. DLIS Annual Conference, University of Zululand. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9558/7ec2e4efb10426e33a786d6c72d5e3f41297.pdf

National Research Foundation. (2017). Sabbatical Grants for Completion of Doctoral Degrees. National Research Foundation.

Niemczyk, E. K. (2018). Developing globally competent researchers: an international perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 171?185. https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-1602

Nyika, A. (2014). Postgraduate research methodological flaws detected at final examination stage: Who is to blame? South African Journal of Science, 110(3/4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/sajs.2014/20130288

Parsloe, E. (1999). The Manager as Coach and Mentor. CIPD.

Passmore, J., & Fillery-Travis, A. (2011). A critical review of executive coaching research: a decade of progress and what's to come. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 4(2), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2011.596484

Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220119986c

Pearson, M., & Kayrooz, C. (2004). Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 9(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296107

Rhodes, C. (2013). Coaching and mentoring for self-efficacious leadership in schools. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/20466851311323087

Solem, M., & Foote, K. (2009). Enhancing departments and graduate education in geography: A disciplinary project in professional development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/1759751X201100002

Ulrich, W., & Dash, D. (2013). Research skills for the future: Summary and critique of a comparative study in eight countries. Journal of Research Practice, 9(1), 1-25. https://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/377

Universities South Africa. (2015). A transformational barometer for South African higher education [Discussion paper].

Higher Education Transformation Summit, Universities South Africa. http://www.usaf.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Transformation-Barometer-_A-Discussion-Paper.pdf

Van der Linde, A. (2012). Supervisor-student relationships: a leadership model for enhancing postgraduate research at a university of technology. University of the Free State.

Van der Westhuizen, P., & De Wet, J. (2003). The training needs of supervisors of postgraduate students in the social sciences and humanities. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(3), 85–195. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v16i3.25231

Vitae. (2010). Researcher development framework. Vitae. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-vitae.pdf/view

Wadee, A., Keane, M., Dietz, T., & Hay, D. (2010). Effective PhD supervision, mentoring and coaching. Rozenburg.

Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. Jossey-Bass.

Whitmore, J. (1996). Coaching for Performance (2nd ed.). Nicholas Brearley.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-07-23

Como Citar

King Costa. (2020). Introducing the C.O.S.T.A Postgraduate Research Coaching Model - A Complementary Approach to Supervision. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 1, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.1.2020.171-185