Proposed Approach for Refinement of Bibliographic Research

Authors

  • Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Educação da Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasil
  • Isabel Pinho Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20

Keywords:

Bibliographic Research, Bibliometric, Co-occurrence Network, Higher Education

Abstract

Scientific mapping has a long tradition and several approaches have been proposed, such as journal citation analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling and words co-occurrence analysis. This paper explores the authors' keywords co-occurrence analysis to refine bibliographic research. An approach is proposed that starts from a more comprehensive bibliographic search and uses the keyword co-occurrence network analysis to identify pairs of keywords that can be used in the construction of a new search expression to refine the initial search. Two examples of how to use the proposed method are presented. A search was carried out on the Covid-19 keyword, selecting the following refinement options: choosing the subject area of Social Sciences and the documents dealing with education. Regarding the types of documents, papers in journals and conferences were included, in addition to the review documents. Then, the two alternatives proposed for the refinement of the initial bibliographic research are exemplified. It is concluded that the proposed approach highlights the main concepts associated with the researched theme and can also be used, in an exploratory way, to identify concepts pertinent to an information need on a thematic domain.

References

Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference, 361-362.

Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2006), Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: a method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68 (3), 377-393.

Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255.

Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235.

Choi, J., Yi, S., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution. Information & Management, 48(8), 371–381.

Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206-1223.

Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis”, Information Processing and Management, 37 (6), 817.

Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2015). Research characteristics and status on social media in China: A bibliometric and co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1167–1182.

Khan, G. F., & Wood, J. (2015). Information technology management domain: Emerging themes and keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 959–972.

Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14 (1), 10-25.

Lee, T. S., Lee, Y. S., Lee, J., & Chang, B. C. (2018). Analysis of the intellectual structure of human space exploration research using a bibliometric approach: Focus on human related factors. Acta Astronautica, 143, 169–182.

Luo, F., Dai, X, & Huang, Y. (2021). The Analysis of Evolutionary Path of Research Topics on the Field of Visualization of International Cultural Heritage Information Since the 21st Century. In E3S Web of Conferences, 236, Art. 05074.

Marshakova, I. V. (1973). A system of document connection based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6 (2), 3-8.

Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh, S. N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: a co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scientometrics, 102 (1), 929-955.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.

Wood, J., & Khan, G. F. (2015). International trade negotiation analysis: Network and semantic knowledge infrastructure. Scientometrics, 105(1), 537–556.

Zhao, W., Mao, J., & Lu, K. (2018). Ranking themes on co-word networks: Exploring the relationships among different metrics. Information Processing and Management, 54(2), 203–218.

Published

2021-07-08

How to Cite

Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi, & Isabel Pinho. (2021). Proposed Approach for Refinement of Bibliographic Research. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 9, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.9.2021.11-20

Issue

Section

Chapters