The metaphenomena as genesis in the triangulation process of qualitative research in the digital era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.14.2022.e593Keywords:
Qualitative research, Triangulation, Digital Age, Metaphenomenon, GenesisAbstract
The qualitative research triangulation process developed by Tuzzo and Braga (2016) adopts a theoretical-methodological reasoning to explain that triangulation in qualitative research can be understood in another way. The multi-method proposal initially elaborated by the researchers is concretized from the definition of the object, the subject and the phenomenon, suggesting, in the study originally developed, that the vertices of triangulation are actually new levels of investigation. In light of the digital revolution, and the advancement of the internet, especially from digital social media platforms, this article presents a new look at the metaphenomenon and its genesis in the triangulation process, providing new perspectives on qualitative research, in such a way that that the subject and object of the research were substantially modified due to the change that occurred in the phenomena, whose change ultimately occurred in its genesis, that is, changes in the facts and/or elements that contributed to produce the phenomena. Thus, the possibility of triangulation even when dealing with the same perspective – qualitative – seems to be an approach that is sustained and makes sense as it offers the researcher multiple and different views of the same place of speech. This reflection is strengthened by showing that triangulation can be carried out in the same type of research – qualitative, which is now expanded and can occur in two ways: physical or digital. As a phenomenon is only part of the various phenomena that make up the metaphenomenon category, choosing a phenomenon, an object and a subject and choosing the mode (physical/digital) explains and enables qualitative research to be carried out from the perspective of the metaphenomenon It is in the metaphenomenon that the possibility of multiple research originates, it is in it that the complexity of research is understood, it is the genesis of the entire investigation process.
References
Benjamin, W. (1985). A obra de arte na era de sua reprodutibilidade técnica. Brasiliense.
Denker, A. de F. & Da Viá, S. C. (2011). Pesquisa empírica em Ciências Humanas. Futura.
Duarte, T. (2009). A possibilidade da investigação a 3: reflexões sobre triangulação (metodológica), n. 60, p. 1-24.
Flick, U. (2009). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. Artmed.
Gil, J. (205). A imagem-nua e as pequenas percepções. Estética e Metafenomenologia. Relógio D´água.
Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V. J. C. (1989). Towards a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (Rumo a uma estrutura conceitual para projetos de avaliação de
métodos mistos. Avaliação Educacional e Análise de Políticas), v. 11, n.3, p. 255-274.
Havelais, A. (2011) Métodos de pesquisa para internet. Sulinas.
Hohfeldt, A. (2011). É possível a pesquisa empírica num país preconceituoso e de tradição escravagista?! Em
Barbosa, M. & Morais, O. J. de. (Ed.). Quem tem medo da pesquisa empírica. Intercom, p. 91-103.
Kerckhove, D. de. (2009). A Pele da Cultura. Annablume.
Latour, Bruno. (2013). Investigácion sobre los modos de existência. (Research on modes of existence). Paidós.
Malhotra, N. (2010). Pesquisa de Marketing: uma orientação aplicada. Bookman.
Marconi, M. de A.& Lakatos, E. M. (2007). Metodologia do trabalho científico. Atlas.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Minayo, M. C. de S. (2000). O desafio do conhecimento: Pesquisa qualitativa em Saúde. 7. ed. Hucitec.
Morin, E. (2005). Ciência com consciência. 8. ed. Bertrand Brasil.
Morin, E. (2005a). O método 4: As ideias. 4. ed. Sulinas.
Souza, J. P. (2011). Quem tem medo da pesquisa empírica? Seguramente, não os pesquisadores portugueses em
jornalismo. Em Barbosa, M.& Morais, O. J. de. (Ed.). Quem tem medo da pesquisa empírica. 1. ed. Intercom, p. 305 321.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). Media and Modernity: a social theory of the media. Polity.
Thompson, J. B. (2018). A interação mediada na era digital. Matrizes. v. 12, nº. 3 set/dez.
Triviños, A. N. S. (1987). Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação. 4. ed. Atlas.
Tuzzo, Simone Antoniaci & Braga, Claudomilson F. (2016). O processo de triangulação da pesquisa qualitativa: o
metafenômeno como gênese. Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa. v. 4, n.5, p. 140-158.
Tuzzo, Simone Antoniaci. (2016). Os sentidos do Impresso. Gráfica UFG
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
