##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Maite Jiménez-Peralta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-1662

Carlos Zamora-Bugueño https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-6674

Abstract

This case study describes how we need to adapt the application of one interpretative phenomenological analysis [IPA]] as an approach, method and technique, when the interactions are online. The scenario takes place in a Chilean higher education institution, under the restrictions of confinement due to the pandemic. The suggestions in these three levels of IPA are shown, based on an investigation carried out on two undergraduate courses of the psychology career whose research question will address understanding the perceptions of the participants, in non-contact courses. We discuss around three ideas: 1) to identify the limits that contextual situations place on the application of the methods of interpretative phenomenological analysis, 2) to understand the ways in which preconceptions affect decision-making, during the application of the method, and 3) to evaluate the limitations of the method when the interactions are online instead of face-to-face. Therefore, the present text explores and discusses the adjustments that researchers must take into account when contextual situations are limiting the application of an IPA and how preconceived ideas affect decision making. Technology is more than a material tool because it has an impact on our emotional response, expressed as a change in the way another person can see us, or by limiting and expanding our communication skills. It is necessary to consider its effects on the meaning contained in the data. Thus, although technological mediation as an approach does not detract from its interpretative value, as a method it must incorporate the technological element as a means and regulator of the learning experience whose evidence can be found in non-verbal communications.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Articles

How to Cite

Maite Jiménez-Peralta, & Carlos Zamora-Bugueño. (2022). The Technological mediation in pandemic and the considerations for interpretive phenomenological analysis. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 15, e755. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.15.2022.e755
References

Alirezaei, S. & Roudsari, R. (2020). Reflections interviews upon the conduct of phenomenological interviews. Journal of Midwifery y Reproductive Health, 8(1), 1986–1987. https://doi.org/10.22038/jmrh.2020.14400

Carcary, M. (2020). The Research Audit Trail: Methodological Guidance for Application in Practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008

Cheung, C., Wong, R. Y. & Man Chan, T. (2020). Online disinhibition: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for online deviant behavior. Industrial Management y Data Systems. ahead-of-print., 121(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0509

Cuthbertson, L., Robb, Y. & Blair, S. (2020). Theory and application of research principles and philosophical underpinning for a study utilising interpretative phenomenological analysis. Radiography, 26(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.11.092

Duque, H. & Aristizábal, E. (2019). Análisis fenomenológico interpretativo. Pensando Psicología, 15(25), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.16925/2382-3984.2019.01.03

Englander, M. (2016). The phenomenological method in qualitative psychology and psychiatry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.30682

?

Garcia, M. (2016). “The Stories We Tell Each Other”. En Emotions, Technology, and Health (pp. 125–147). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-801737-1.00007-x

Jiménez-Peralta, M. & Zamora-Bugueño, C. (2022). La enseñanza de la investigación cualitativa mediada por la tecnología. Aprendizajes del docente. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 13(38), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.46925/rdluz.3512

Larkins, M., Watts, S. & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp062oa

Marí-Mollà, R., Bo-Bonet, R. & Climent, C. I. (2010). Propuesta de análisis fenomenológico de los datos obtenidos en la entrevista. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l’Educació, 1(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2010.1.643

Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. y Spiers, J. (2002). Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202

Muros, B. (2011). El concepto de identidad en el mundo virtual: el yo online. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 14(2), 49–56.

Oztok, M., Lee, K. y Brett, C. (2012). Towards Better Understanding of Self-Representation in Online Learning. En T. Bastiaens y G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2012--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. (Vol. 1, pp. 1867–1874). Recuperado de https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/41879/.

Renau, V., Oberst, U. & Carbonell-Sánchez, X. (2013). Construction of identity through online social networks: A look from the social constructionism | Construcción de la identidad a través de las redes sociales online: Una mirada desde el construccionismo social. Anuario de Psicologia, 43(2), 159–170.

Smith, J., Flowers, P. & Larkins, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, Method and Research. Londres: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Symeonides, R. & Childs, C. (2015). The personal experience of online learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(PA), 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.015

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs Computers in Human Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.020

Wright, M. (2017). Online Identity Construction. En P. Rossler, C. Hoffner, y L. Van Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0169

Yao, M. & Ling, R. (2020). “What Is Computer-Mediated Communication?”—An Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz027