##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Azaleah Mohd Anis https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8969-4501

Nadia Olisa https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6203-1072

Abstract

The key benefits of qualitative research are rich insights and thick data. However, some argue these come at the cost of small sample sizes and low generalisability of findings. With traditional FGDs (FGDs), this could be addressed by conducting multiple groups. However, this requires significant investment of time and manpower. We explored methods to gather thick data quickly, aiming to increase the number of respondents without increasing manpower or lengthening fieldwork while maintaining data quality. In this paper, we detail our experience running a pilot study of a 1.5 hour online discussion with N=100 respondents, to capture in-depth responses at scale. Using pre-programmed questions and artificial intelligence (AI) to provide instant visual analyses of responses and additional probes to respondents live, we ran a full qualitative study with a bigger sample in the same duration required for a typical FGD. The discussion was text-based, with respondents being able to view and give their agreement or disagreement to what others may have said without interaction between them. The data was compared to data collected from a previous study with a similar topic and analysed from an operational aspect of conducting research and gathering insights from both methodologies. While this methodology does not replace traditional FGD, it has proven effective in scaling up qualitative research by gathering large amounts of qualitative data within a short duration, in real-time. The methodology has its limitations, primarily the inability to further nuance responses. Despite this, the pilot study appears to be a successful attempt conceptually, as the AI generated valuable instant insights while the study was ongoing, particularly from open-ended (OE) responses. It may add value to specific use cases such as quick sensing which require both breadth and scalability.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Articles

How to Cite

Mohd Anis, A., & Olisa, N. (2024). THE END OF TRADITIONAL FOCUS GROUPS? : SCALING UP QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUICK, YET MAINTAINING DEPTH OF DATA WITH LARGER SAMPLES. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 20(1), e799. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.1.2024.e799
References

Agius, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research: It’s value and applicability. The Psychiatrist, 37(6), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.042770

Almutrafi, F. (2019). The what, why and how of Conducting Focus-Group Research. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(5), 235. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190705.18

Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2019). “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 30(5), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354

Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878

Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. Oxford University Press.

Brower, R. L., Jones, T. B., Osborne-Lampkin, L. T., Hu, S., & Park-Gaghan, T. J. (2019). Big qual: Defining and debating qualitative inquiry for large data sets. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691988069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919880692

Cambria, E. (2016). Affective Computing and Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.31.

Christensen, N. (2015, June 17). The death of the focus group? Mumbrella. https://mumbrella.com.au/the-death-of-the-focus-group-300413

Davidson, E., Edwards, R., Jamieson, L., & Weller, S. (2018). Big Data, qualitative style: A breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0757-y

Fontaine, C. M., Baker, A. C., Zaghloul, T. H., & Carlson, M. (2020). Clinical data mining with The listening guide: An approach to narrative big qual. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692095174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920951746

Garcia-Ceja, E., Osmani, V., & Mayora-Ibarra, O. (2015). Automatic Stress Detection in Working Environments From Smartphones’ Accelerometer Data: A First Step. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 20, 1053-1060. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2446195.

Gao, Y., Wang, F., Luan, H., & Chua, T. (2014). Brand Data Gathering From Live Social Media Streams. Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/2578726.2578748.

Ghia, A., Langstaff, M., Ware, D., & Wavra, R. (2021, March 18). Accelerating data and analytics transformations in the public sector. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/accelerating-data-and-analytics-transformations-in-the-public-sector

Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x16639015

Guinee, S. (2016, August 11). Sentiment analysis: A better way to measure success. Medium. https://medium.com/atlantic-57/sentiment-analysis-a-better-way-to-measure-success-3b40a7d5d89

Gundumogula, M. (2020). Importance of focus groups in qualitative research. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2020/v8/i11/hs2011-082

Hoick. (2023, October 2). Market insights: Harnessing the power of Data Mining. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/market-insights-harnessing-power-data-mining-mxhoick

Hunt, G., Moloney, M., & Fazio, A. (2011). Embarking on large-scale qualitative research: Reaping the benefits of mixed methods in studying youth, clubs and Drugs. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 28(5–6), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10199-011-0040-1

Kolonin, A. (2018). Personalized Social Connectivity and Reputation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03402-3_25.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. SAGE.

Lycett, M. (2013). ‘datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.10

Marr, B. (2015, November 10). Big data: A game changer in the retail sector. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2015/11/10/big-data-a-game-changer-in-the-retail-sector/?sh=4d7a369a9f37

Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Mghames, F. (2021, October 29). Advertising week. Advertising Week. https://advertisingweek.com/focus-groups-are-dead-welcome-to-the-smoke-test-era/

Mimura, K., Kishino, H., Karino, G., Nitta, E., Senoo, A., Ikegami, K., Kunikata, T., Yamanouchi, H., Nakamura, S., Sato, K., & Koshiba, M. (2015). Potential of a smartphone as a stress-free sensor of daily human behaviour. Behavioural Brain Research, 276, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.06.007.

Narayanan, S., & Georgiou, P. (2013). Behavioral Signal Processing: Deriving Human Behavioral Informatics From Speech and Language. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101, 1203-1233. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2236291.

Neale, B., & Bishop, L. (2012). The Timescapes Archive: A stakeholder approach to archiving qualitative longitudinal data. Qualitative Research, 12(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111426233

Ramsdale, B. (2021, June 10). Focus Groups: Dead or alive?. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/focus-groups-dead-alive-brooke-ramsdale

Remesh (n.d.). Common Topics. https://remesh.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/14838849039255-Common-Topics#h_01HE0TJ7KHGT5J6B2GXZDXCJEH

Rolf, F., Campbell, N., Thompson, S., & Argus, G. (2021). Australians’ experience of the COVID-19 pandemic: Advantages and challenges of scaling up qualitative research using large-scale rapid analysis and Building Research Capacity Across Rural Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110519. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211051937

Scantlebury, A., & Adamson, J. (2022). Conducting a large, longitudinal, multi-site qualitative study within a mixed methods evaluation of a UK national health policy: Reflections from the GPED study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692211408. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221140873

Strong, C. (2013). The challenge of “Big data”: What does it mean for the qualitative research industry? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 17(4), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/qmr-10-2013-0076

Valentine, M. (2021, June 9). Santander’s marketing boss on why there’s “no role” for Focus Groups. Marketing Week. https://www.marketingweek.com/market-research-santander-competitive-advantage-focus-group/

Whitaker, E. (2021, June 14). Is the focus group dead?. Bellomy Market Intelligence. https://www.bellomy.com/blog/focus-group-dead

Wonderflow (2021, April 14). Sentiment Analysis is Killing the Focus Groups: The Disruption of Market Research. Wonderflow. https://www.wonderflow.ai/blog/sentiment-analysis-is-killing-the-focus-group-the-disruption-of-market-research/