Qualitative Research for Interdisciplinary Studies: Multiple Methodologies for Multiple Disciplines
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9606-0769
Catarina Brandão
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-5605
Kyle Bower
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-356X
Sonia Verdugo-Castro
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-1029
Abstract
The intent of research is to improve the lives of individuals and communities. Through qualitative research specifically, we can deepen our understanding of reality and investigate the nuances of how people experience and make meaning from it. Qualitative research, as a scientific approach, enables researchers to examine phenomena from the point of view of those who live it. Qualitative researchers seek to understand individuals’ experiences, perceptions, thoughts, and emotions that are constructed through social rules, cultural patterns shaped by the communities and societies in which they live. Although research objectives differ, qualitative research is defined by a systematic process of researchers' identifying and interrogating their positionality, subjectivities, and influential paradigms. In this introduction readers will note similar methodologies; however, these are presented in the context of multiple disciplines. This volume demonstrates the evolving interdisciplinarity of qualitative research methods that engages scholars in innovative conversation. This editorial offers a peek at the interdisciplinary potential of qualitative research. Such interdisciplinary prowess is found in Volume 16 of New Trends in Qualitative Research.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Balogun, J. A., Adekanmbi, A. A., & Balogun, F. A. (2023). Surgical residents as 'second victims' following exposure to medical errors in a tertiary health training facility in Nigeria: a phenomenology study. Patient Safety in Surgery, 17(1), 1-8. https://doaj.org/article/efff050e781b42199567827ebca007ed
Barrios, B. E. (2015). Tres momentos críticos de la Teoría Fundamentada Clásica [Three critical moments of classic grounded theory]. SAPIENS, 16(1), 31–47. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1317-58152015000100003
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2023). Grounded theory: A practical guide (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Bower, K. L. (2022). Implementing QDAS throughout an evaluation project using the Five-Level QDA Method. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(4), 620-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211027952
Cárcel Carrasco, F. J., & Roldán Porta, C. (2013). Los métodos de investigación cualitativa enfocados al mantenimiento industrial [Qualitative research methods focused on industrial maintenance]. Técnica industrial, 303, 40–48. https://m.riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/51866/C%C3%A1rcel%20Carrasco%2C%20FJ%2C%20Rold%C3%A1n- Porta%2C%20Carlos_Los%20m%C3%A9todos%20de%20investigaci%C3%B3n%20cualitativa....pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed). SAGE.
Choi, K. M., & Oh, I. (2021). A phenomenological approach to understanding sexual minority college students in South Korea. Journal of Multicultural Counseling & Development, 49(4), 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12227
Daun, M., Grubb, A. M., Stenkova, V., Tenbergen, B. (2023). A systematic literature review of requirements engineering education. Requirements Engineering, 28(2), 145-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-022-00381-9
Dzhalila, D., Siahaan, D., Fauzan, R., Asyrofi, R., & Karimi, M. I. (2023). A systematic review on blockchain technology in software engineering. Journal ELTIKOM: Journal Teknik Elektro, 7(1), 38-49. https://doaj.org/article/a252c4856fac4aaca030f40057b106f3
Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (1999). Moral order and the Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. In P. Jalbert (Ed.), Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches (pp. 195-230). University Press of America.
Fischer, H., Seidenstricker, S., & Poeppelbuss, J. (2023). The triggers and consequences of digital sales: A systematic literature review. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 43(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2022.2102029
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Gardner, R. (2013). Conversation analysis in the classroom. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 593-611). Wiley-Blackwell.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
González Cumpa, J. L. (2014). Propuesta de un análisis cualitativo de riesgos en etapas de licitación de obras públicas de construcción [Proposal for a qualitative risk analysis in tendering stages of public construction works]. Universidad de Piura. https://pirhua.udep.edu.pe/handle/11042/1877
Gonzalez-Prieto, A., Perez, J., Diaz, J., & Lopez-Fernandez, D. (2023). Reliability in software engineering qualitative research through inter-coder agreement. Journal of Systems and Software, 202, Article 111707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111707
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Husserl, E. (2017). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Martino Fine Books.
Jaumot-Pascual, N., Ong, M., Silva, C., & Martinez-Gudapakkam, A. (2021). Women of color leveraging community cultural wealth to persist in computing and tech graduate education: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Education Sciences, 11(12), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120797
Jerpseth, H., Kaasen, A., Lafontan, S. R., & Eri, T. S. (2023). Experiences of Norwegian co-parents during COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 18(1), Article 2215578. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2215578
Klank, C., Himmelsbach, I., & Doh, M. (2023). A qualitative case study focusing on the relationship of biography, education, and ICT use of older adults. Educational Gerontology, 49(5), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2209447
Langdridge, D. (2018). Phenomenological psychology. Oxford Bibliographies: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0210
Lester, J. N., & O’Reilly, M. (2018). Applied conversational analysis: Social interaction in institutional settings. SAGE.
Levitt, H. M. (2021). Essentials of critical-constructivist grounded theory research. Essentials of Qualitative Methods: APA.
Loose, F., Hudders, L., Vanwesenbeek, I., De Jans, S. (2023). Preschoolers and advertising: A systematic literature review and future research agenda on the effects of advertising on preschool children. Journal of Advertising, 52(3), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2043794
Lycett, D., & Patel, R. (2023). Spiritual care within dietetic practice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Religion & Health, 62(2), 1223-1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01555-z
Mellado, B. H., Pilger, T. L., Neto, O. B. P., Silva, J. C. R. e., Nogueira, A. A., Brandão, C. d. V., & Reis, F. J. C. d. (2020). Daily life attitudes of women with moderate or severe chronic pelvic pain. A qualitative study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 254, 109-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.001
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
Pereira dos Santos, M. L., & dos Santos Lopes, H. (2023). Humanitarian logistics in natural disaster management: A COVID-19- oriented systematic literature review (SLR). Revista de Gestao e Secretariado-Gesec, 14(2), 1986–2001. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i2.1678
Pope, E. M. (2020). “This is a head, hearts, and hands enterprise”: Adult learning in interfaith dialogue. Adult Education Quarterly, 70(3), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619888632
Pope, E. M., & Paulus, T. M. (2023). Agree to disagree? Allowing for ideological difference during interfaith dialogue following scriptural reasoning. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 58(1), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2023.0002
Quraishi, Z. (2023). Addressing mental health, misinformation, & religious tensions among South Asian students across California higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative research study. Heliyon, 9(6), e16396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16396
Rothuizen-Lindenschot, M., Graff, M. J. L., de Boer, L., de Groot, I. J. M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G., Steultjens, E. M. J., & Koene, S. (2023). Using PRPP-Assessment for measuring change in everyday activities by home-based videos: An exploratory case series study in children with multiple disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. Advance onlne publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12893
Roulston, K. (2010). Introducing ethnomethodological analysis to the field of music education. Music Education Research, 3(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800120089205
Sánchez-Candamio, M. (1999). Evaluación de programas de salud desde la perspectiva de la metodología cualitativa [Evaluation of health programmes from the perspective of qualitative methodology]. Atención Primaria, 24(8), 487–491. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-atencion-primaria-27-articulo-evaluacion-programas-salud-desde-perspectiva-13401
Shoneye, C. L., Kwasnicka, D., Mullan, B., Pollard, C. M., Boushey, C. J., & Kerr, D. A. Dietary assessment methods used in adult digital weight loss interventions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, 36(3), 997-1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13101
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Snijders, D., van der Duin, P., Marchau, V., & van Doorn, G. J. (2018). Scenarios for ICT-related education: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Future Studies, 23(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0002
Sousa, B., & Brandão, C. (2019). Leader development: evaluating a leader development program. Proceedings of Leadership and Human Resources Development, Sofia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347984459_Leader_Development_Evaluating_a_Leader_Development_Program
Spradley, J. (2016). Participant observation (reissue). Waveland Press, Inc.
Steinmetz, K. F., & Holt, T. J. (2023). Falling for social engineering: A qualitative analysis of social engineering policy recommendations. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117501
Steinmetz, K. F., Holt, T. J., & Brewer, C. G. (2023). Developing and implementing social engineering-prevention policies: A qualitative study. Security Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-023-00385-2
Thornburn, M., & Stolz, S. A. (2020). Understanding experience better in educational contexts: the phenomenology of embodied subjectivity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1632798
Tonui, B. C., Miller, V. J., & Adeniji, D. O. (2023). Older immigrant adults experiences with social isolation: A qualitative interpretive meta synthesis. Aging & Mental Health, 27(6), 1068-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2068131
Topcu, G., Mhizha-Murira, J. R., Griffiths, H., Bale, C., Drummond, A., Fitzmimmons, D., Potter, K., Evangelou, N., & das Nair, R. (2023). Experiences of receiving a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Disability & Rehabilitation, 45(5), 772-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2046187
Tubaro, P., Ryan, L., & D’Angelo, A. (2016). The visual sociogram in qualitative and mixed methods research. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3864
Urbano Gil, H. (2007). El enfoque etnometodológico en la investigación científica [The ethnomethodological approach in scientific research]. Liberabit. Revista Peruana de Psicología, 13, 89-91. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-48272007000100011
van de Velde, C., Boudreault, S., & Berniard, L. (2023). Youth loneliness in pandemic times: A qualitative study in Quebec and Ontario. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), Article 2223671. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2223671
Vargas Cuadros, L. A. (2015). Análisis cualitativo de la integración de áreas en un proyecto de obra civil [Qualitative analysis of integration project areas in civil engineering]. Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. http://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/handle/10654/13610
Verdugo-Castro, S. (2019). Detection of needs in the lines of work of third sector entities for unemployed women in situations of social exclusion. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 0(34), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2019.34.12
Verdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2020). Interviews of Spanish women in STEM: a multimedia analysis about their experiences. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020). ACM.
Vivar, C. G., Arantzamendi, M., López-Dicastillo, O., & Gordo Luis, C. (2010). La Teoría Fundamentada como Metodología de Investigación Cualitativa en Enfermería [Grounded theory as a qualitative research methodology in nursing]. Index de Enfermería, 19(4), 283–288. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962010000300011&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
Wang, X., Edison, H., Khanna, D., & Rafiq, U. (2023). How many papers should you review? A research synthesis of systematic literature reviews in software engineering. (Working Paper). http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06056
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study research in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102