##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Gerson de Souza Mol https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-0513

Josenaide Pereira do Nascimento https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-2584

Lelia Cordeiro Freire Bezzan https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8328-1884

Rita de Cássia Cunha Bom Jardim https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0556-1037

Abstract

The idea for the theme came from the student's rational speech, the first author on homeopathy and the questioning of science and pseudoscience. In the process of building chemistry as a science, alchemy left important contributions such as laboratory techniques and the figure of Paracelsus who organized the first scientific communities. Science is a human construction and this construction took place through a process influenced by different factors. Scientific knowledge is the result of processes that follow formalities and arises from the rigor of what is called the scientific method. The work methodology was the application of an electronic form-type questionnaire that was careful to be directed to people who had a connection with science in their professional routine. UnB IQ. The results were analyzed using a quali-quantitative method. When the form was interrupted for responses, there were 61 participants and of this total, 16 teachers. It was verified that the participants are divided in their beliefs about homeopathy and science, however, the interesting thing is that even two participants who do not believe resort to   homeopathy to treat symptoms that they also treat with allopathic medicines. In post-pandemic times, it is important to look at science and credit the scientist's role in dealing with these issues. However, homeopathy cannot be disregarded as a care practice, as it is part of a list of therapeutic lines of the SUS that look at the individual and his integrality and do not disregard allopathy.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Articles

How to Cite

Gerson de Souza Mol, Josenaide Pereira do Nascimento, Lelia Cordeiro Freire Bezzan, & Rita de Cássia Cunha Bom Jardim. (2023). HOMEOPATHY X SCIENCE: WHAT CHEMISTRY TEACHERS THINK. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 19, e832. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.19.2023.e832
References

Andrade, Nunes e Aguiar. Revista Científica do ITPAC, Araguaína, v.6, n.3, Pub.6, Julho 2013.

Bardosh K, Krug A, Jamrozik e, et al. J Med Ethics E pub ahead of print: Acessado em 18 de março de 2023.doi:10.1136/medethics-2022-108449

Chalmers, A. F., & Fiker, R. (1993). O que é ciência afinal? (pp. 23-63). São Paulo: Brasiliense. Acesso em: 1 de fev. de 2023.

Mendonça, A.; em https://www.colab.re/conteudo/ciencia#:~:text=Ent%C3%A 3o%2C%20o%20que%20%C3%A9%20ci%C3%AAncia,scientia%2C%20a%20palavra%20significa%20conhe cimento. Acesso em 17 de março de 2023.

Laville, C., Dionne, J. (1999). A construção do saber. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 340, 1990.

Loch-Neckel, G., Carmignan, F., & Crepaldi, M. A. (2010). A homeopatia no SUS na perspectiva de estudantes da área da saúde. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 34, 82-90.

Machado, M., M.; Silva, G.M; e Fontella,l.G.; Letramento científico e percepções populares: uma análise sobre conhecimentos de Ciência e pseudociência Ci. e Nat., Santa Maria, v. 43, e92, 2021 • https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X63306 Submissão: 29/11/2020 • Aprovação: 09/10/2021 • Publicação: 08/12/2021

Ministério da saúde. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/p/pics. Acesso em 18 de março de 2023.

Ministério da Saude.https://infoms.saude.gov.br/extensions/covid-19_html/covid-19_html.html. Acesso em 18 de março de 2023.

Moraes, Roque; Galiazzi, Maria do C. Análise textual discursiva. Ijuí: Editora Unijuí, 2011.

Sanchez-Mendiola, M. ¿Qué podemos hacer como educadores ante la anticiencia y los “hechos alternativos”?: trascendiendo la era de la mentira. Investigación educ. médica, México, v. 6, n. 22, p. 67- 69, jun. 2017.

Sigolo, Renata Palandri. Nilo Cairo e o debate homeopático no início do século XX. Curitiba: UFPR. 2012.

Teixeira, M., Z.; Plausibilidade do modelo científico homeopático na medicina contemporânea do Brasil v.26, n.4, out.-dez. 2019, p.1393-1395

Thiollent, Michel. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. 18 ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.

Young, Pablo. La farsa de la homeopatía. Rev. méd. Chile, Santiago, v. 142, n. 2, p. 272-273, feb. 2014. Disponível em <http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872014000200021 &lng=es&nrm=iso>. acessado em 18 março 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034- 98872014000200021