RESEARCHING ABOUT EXPERIENCES OF MOTHERHOOD: SUGGESTIONS FOR ASKING COMPETITIVE PROJECTS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
One of the demands of the academic community for the selection and accreditation processes of their members is to lead competitive research projects. Many young researchers face the challenge of being a “Principal Investigator” for the first time without prior experience or support. To this end, we believe that it is necessary to share experiences of presenting subsidized projects (also failures) among the academic community. The objective of this article is twofold: on the one hand, to consider the difficulty of structuring research projects to receive grants from the institutions and, on the other, to share and discuss strategies and complexities of the qualitative approach based on the project proposal made by the author. The referred project was presented in the 2021 call for "Proyectos de Generación de Conocimiento " of the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain. The proposal is based on the fact that the transition from modernity to post-modernity materialises in different dimensions and processes that are relevant to their study from the social sciences perspective. One of them is the management of imaginaries associated to motherhood as a representative institution of a particular geographical and historical context. Understanding the associated processes, representations and narratives on motherhood is one of the challenges concerning today's society as a whole, not just women and mothers. The general objective of this project is to delve into the narratives of women and mothers who break (or wish to break) with the practices and meanings associated with "traditional motherhood". Thus, we aim to explore the processes of change, continuity, and subversion in the motherhood management within the framework of advanced modern or post-modern societies.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Caïs, J., Folguera, L. y Formoso, C. (2014). Investigación Cualitativa Longitudinal. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Cuadernos Metodológicos.
Donath, O. (2016). Madres arrepentidas: una mirada radical a la maternidad y sus falacias sociales. Reservoir Books.
Hammersley, M., y Atkinson, P. (1994). Etnografía. Métodos de investigación. Paidós.
McLeod, J. y Thomson, R. (2009). Researching Social Change. Londres: Sage.
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (2021). “Orden por la que se aprueba la convocatoria de tramitación anticipada para el año 2021 del procedimiento de concesión de ayudas a «Proyectos de Generación de Conocimiento», en el marco del Programa Estatal para Impulsar la Investigación Científico-Técnica y su Transferencia, del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica, Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023.”. En https://www.aei.gob.es/convocatorias/buscador-convocatorias/proyectos-generacion-conocimiento-2021/convocatoria
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (2021b). “Instrucciones para rellenar la memoria científico-técnica para proyectos individuales”. Convocatoria 2021 de Proyectos de Generación de Conocimiento. En: https://www.aei.gob.es/convocatorias/buscador-convocatorias/proyectos-generacion-conocimiento-2021/convocatoria
Rich, A. (1976). Of Woman Born. Motherhood as Experience and Institution. Norton.
Roca Girona, J., Folguera, L. y Anzil, V. (2022). “De tres investigaciones cualitativas a una investigación cualitativa longitudinal sobre género e interculturalidad en parejas binacionales en España”. Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, (54), 65–94.
Saldaña, J. (2003). Longitudinal Qualitative Research: analyzing Change through time. Oxford: Altamira Press.
Thomson, R. y Holland, J. (2003). “Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative Research”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(3): 233-44.