EDUCATING THE "GODS": OPERATIONS, OUTCOMES, AND OPPORTUNTIES IN TREATMENT COURTS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction/Frame: Treatment courts (TCs) were developed in the 1980s to address challenges facing individuals with a substance use disorder (SUD) involved in the criminal justice (CJ) system. TCs are an alternative to the punitive nature of the CJ system by joining SUD treatment with the accountability of the judicial system. By design, treatment court (TC) implementations are highly varied. Each implementation adopts the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP) key components that are consistent with yet bound by their community resources, values, and political realities. Research Questions/Objective: Using qualitative community-based participatory research, two case studies and one phenomenological study were conducted with treatment courts in a mid-Atlantic state in the USA to examine successful TC operations. Methodology: Using purposive sampling, the analytic plan included individual semi-structured interviews with judges, TC team members, program graduates, and community stakeholders. Interviews were professionally transcribed and coded consistent with thematic analysis procedures. Results: Analysis revealed themes of judicial sovereignty juxtaposed with a lack of knowledge of SUDs, the importance of a fully dedicated coordinator to serve as an extension of the judge, and purposeful courtroom set-up and norms conducive to a therapeutic rather than punitive approach. Final Considerations: Transferable recommendations to other specialty docket evaluators and teams which can be adopted to fit a variety of dockets, including mental health court, veterans court, and juvenile court include mandatory judicial training, evolving operations norms, values alignment among the TC team, and a TC coordinator to oversee day-to-day operations. In addition, stakeholder engagement to drive an iterative evaluation process converges with the traditions of action research in community settings.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Bruns, E. J., Pullmann, M. D., Weathers, E. S., Wirschem, M. L., & Murphy, J. K. (2012). Effects of
multidisciplinary family drug treatment court on child and family outcomes: Results of a quasi
experimental study. Child Maltreatment, 17(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559512454216
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/bja/205621.pdf
Cappa, C. (2006). The social, political and theoretical context of drug courts. Monash University Law
Review 32, 145. https://doi.org/10.3316/apaft.086839462669077
Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., & Finigan, M. W. (2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court:
Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage
Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd
ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches. Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Gallagher, J., Nordberg, A., & Kennard, T. (2015). A qualitative study assessing the effectiveness of the
key components of a drug court, Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(1), 64–81.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.982453
Fessinger, M., Hazen, K., Bahm, J., Cole-Mossman, J., Heideman, R., & Brank, E. (2019). Mandatory, fast,
and fair: Case outcomes and procedural justice in a family drug court. Journal of Experimental
Criminology, 16(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09361-6
Frazer, M. S. (2006). The impact of the community court model on defendant perceptions of fairness: A
case study at the Red Hook Community Justice Center. Center for Court Innovation.
Giorgi, A. (1994). A phenomenological perspective on certain qualitative research methods. Journal of
Phenomenological Psychology, 25, 190–220.
https://brill.com/view/journals/jpp/jppoverview.xml?language=en
Goldkamp, J. (1994). Miami's drug treatment court for felony defendants: Some implications of
assessment findings. The Prison Journal, 74(2), 110–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032855594074002002
Gottfredson, D. C., Kearley, B. W., Najaka, S. S., & Rocha, C. M. (2007). How drug treatment courts work:
An analysis of mediators. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44(1), 3–35.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427806291271
Heideman, R. J., Cole-Mossman, J., Hoetger, L., & Hazen, K. (2016). Giving parents a voice: A case study
of a family treatment drug court track in Lancaster County, Nebraska. Court Review, 52, 36–42.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1539&context=ajacourtreview
Kaiser, K. A., & Holtfreter, K. (2016). An integrated theory of specialized court programs: Using procedural
justice and therapeutic jurisprudence to promote offender compliance and rehabilitation. Criminal
Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815609642
Logsdon, A. R., Antle, B. F., Katz, R. S., Barbee, A. P., Kamer, C., & Spriggs, A. (2021). The impact of
engagement on child welfare families involved with family treatment drug courts. Juvenile and Family
Court Journal, 72, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12210
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17556988
Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic
review. Journal of Community Corrections, 15(1), 5–11.
MacKenzie, B. (2016). The judge is the key component: the importance of procedural fairness in drug
treatment courts. Court Review., 52(1).
Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Lee, P. A., Dugosh, K. L., & Benasutti, K. M. (2006). Matching judicial
supervision to clients' risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 52–76.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281746
Marlowe, D. B., & Carey, S. M. (2012). Research update on family drug courts. National Association of
Drug Court Professionals.
Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research methods and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage
Publications.
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms
and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://doi.
org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
Rapp RC, Xu J, Carr CA, Lane DT, Wang J, Carlson R. (2006) Treatment barriers identified by substance
abusers assessed at a centralized intake unit. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, (3) 227-35. .https:.//
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.01.002.
Smith Ramey, J., Volk, F., Milacci, F., & Kelley, B. (2023). "If not you, then who?": A qualitative case study of a drug treatment court. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2023.2243494
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2018). Key substance use and mental
health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2017 national survey on drug use and health (HHS
Publication No. SMA 18-5068, NSDUH Series H-53). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/cbhsq-reports/NSDUHFFR2017/NSDUHFFR2017.pdf
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2022, September 13). Recovery and
recovery support. https://www.samhsa.gov/find-help/recovery
https://www.samhsa.gov/findhelp/recovery
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
Von Hirsch, A. (1998). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal
Behaviour and Mental Health, 8(4), 330–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.276
Yatsco AJ, Garza RD, Champagne-Langabeer T, Langabeer JR. (2020). Alternatives to arrest for illicit
opioid use: A joint criminal justice and healthcare treatment collaboration. Substance Abuse: Research
and Treatment. 14. https://doi:10.1177/1178221820953390
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Sage
Zabloski, J., & Milacci, F. (2012). Gifted dropouts: Phenomenological case studies of rural gifted
students. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 6(3). https://www.jeqr.org
Similar Articles
- Fred Milacci, Fred Volk, Jennifer Smith Ramey, TAKING IT TO THE STREET: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL PROMOTING THE ESSENTIALITY OF TRUST IN COMMUNITY-FOCUSED QUALITATIVE RESEARCH , New Trends in Qualitative Research: Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.