The Use of Smart Speakers in Disability: A Scoping Review

Authors

  • Rafael Tavares Escola Superior de Saúde, Politécnico de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
  • Helena Sousa Centro de Estudos do Movimento e Atividade Humana, (CEMAH), Departamento de Terapia Ocupacional, Politécnico do Porto, Portugal
  • Jaime Ribeiro Centro de Investigação em Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF), Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal; Center for Innovative Care and Health, Escola Superior de Saúde, Technology (ciTechCare), Politécnico de Leiria, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.8.2021.392-403

Keywords:

Disability, Internet of Things, Smart Home, Voice Activated Systems

Abstract

Introduction: Smart speakers, like Amazon Echo and Google Nest, are established in the worldwide mainstream market, being available to the general population. The artificial intelligence programmed within these conversational devices and their compatibility with different networks creates opportunities for a wide range of interventions in different populations with disability, in a smart home context; Goals: To understand how smart speakers are being used by individuals with disability, uncovering possibilities of intervention and considering their potential; Methods: A scoping review of articles present in PubMed/Medline, B-On, Scopus and Web of Science databases in February 2021 was conducted. Articles published since 2016 until 2021, written in Portuguese and English and peer reviewed were considered. Studies exploring the use of general market available smart speakers (Google Nest / Home, Amazon Echo, Invoke, HomePod) as an home intervention agent or environmental control unit, focusing on individuals with sensorial, cognitive, emotional and motor impairment were included; Results: Different approaches and user demands were identified. Devices were applied as a single solution or as an element of bigger systems, interacting with other devices or software’s; Conclusions: The identification of different interventions for different disabilities underlines the intervention potential of these devices with observed functional improvements in physical, cognitive, sensory, and emotional disabilities. These improvements can promote the replacement of expensive devices created for niche populations and closed systems developed with specific goals in a specific form of disability. As customization is a relevant feature, the application of SS does not dispense with technical support in the process.

References

Ammari, T., Kaye, J., Tsai, J. Y., & Bentley, F. (2019). Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 26(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956

Aromatis, E., & Munn, Z. (2020). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01

Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., & Yu, S. (2021). My Smart Speaker is Cool! Perceived Coolness, Perceived Values, and Users’ Attitude toward Smart Speakers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(6), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841404

Ballati, F., Corno, F., & Russis, L. De. (2018). “ Hey Siri , do you understand me ?”: Virtual Assistants and Dysarthria.

Bentley, F., Luvogt, C., White, B., & Lottridge, D. (2018). Understanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants. 2(3).

Boumpa, E., Gkogkidis, A., Charalampou, I., Ntaliani, A., Kakarountas, A., & Kokkinos, V. (2019). An Acoustic-Based Smart Home System for People Suffering from Dementia. Technologies (2227-7080), 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010029

Ghazal, M., Basmaji, T., Qasymeh, M., Salim, R., & Khalil, A. (2019). Localized assistive scene understanding using deep learning and the IoT. Proceedings - 2019 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops, FiCloudW 2019, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloudW.2019.00023

Guzman, A. L. (2017). Citation: Guzman, A.L. (2017). Making AI safe for humans: A conversation. 69–85.

Hoy, M. B. (2018). Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 37(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391

Hugo, N., Israr, T., Boonsuk, W., Ben Miloud, Y., Cloward, J., & Liu, P. P. (2021). Usability Study of Voice-Activated Smart Home Technology. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_54

Judge, S., Robertson, Z., & Hawley, M. S. (2009). Users’ perceptions of environmental control systems. Assistive Technology Research Series, 25, 426–431. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-042-1-426

Kafle, K., Moran, K., Manandhar, S., Nadkarni, A., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2021). Security in centralized data store-based home automation platforms: A systematic analysis of nest and hue. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3418286

Kepuska, V., & Bohouta, G. (2018). Next-generation of virtual personal assistants (Microsoft Cortana, Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa and Google Home). 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, CCWC 2018, 2018-Janua(c), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCWC.2018.8301638

Li, B., Sainath, T. N., Narayanan, A., Caroselli, J., Bacchiani, M., Misra, A., … Shannon, M. (2017). Acoustic modeling for Google home. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, 2017-August(August), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-234

Ling, H. C., Chen, H. R., Ho, K. K. W., & Hsiao, K. L. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting customers’ intention to purchase a smart speaker. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59(October 2020), 102331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102331

Masina, F., Orso, V., Pluchino, P., Dainese, G., Volpato, S., Nelini, C., … Gamberini, L. (2020). Investigating the Accessibility of Voice Assistants With Impaired Users: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e18431. https://doi.org/10.2196/18431

Noda, K. (2018). Google Home: smart speaker as environmental control unit. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 13(7), 674–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1369589

Pradhan, A., Mehta, K., & Findlater, L. (2018). “ Accessibility Came by Accident” Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.

Riccardi, G. (2014). Towards healthcare personal agents. RFMIR 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Roadmapping the Future of Multimodal Interaction Research Including Business Opportunities and Challenges, Co-Located with ICMI 2014, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2666253.2666266

Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., Canny, J. F., Malik, J. M., Edwards, D. D., Jonathan, S. J. S., & Norvig, P. (1995). A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Smith, E., Sumner, P., Hedge, C., & Powell, G. (2020). Smart-speaker technology and intellectual disabilities: agency and wellbeing. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1864670

Wallace, T., & Morris, J. (2018). Identifying barriers to usability: Smart speaker testing by military veterans with mild brain injury and PTSD. In Breaking Down Barriers: Usability, Accessibility and Inclusive Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_10

Wortmann, F., & Flüchter, K. (2015). Internet of Things: Technology and Value Added. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 57(3), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0383-3

Published

2021-07-08

How to Cite

Rafael Tavares, Helena Sousa, & Jaime Ribeiro. (2021). The Use of Smart Speakers in Disability: A Scoping Review. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 8, 392–403. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.8.2021.392-403