RESEARCH ETHICS IN DISABILITY: INSIGHTS FROM QUALITATIVE VISUAL IMPAIRMENT STUDY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Researchers are responsible for ensuring that their studies adhere to established ethical standards. However, compliance with these standards can vary across participants and contexts. This is especially important when studying individuals with disabilities, who may be more sensitive and vulnerable compared to those without disabilities. Ethical considerations become critical in this context, as researchers must carefully navigate the complexities of working with such populations. Drawing from the researchers’ case study on inclusive education for students with visual impairments (partial, low vision, or total blindness), this paper highlights the ethical dilemmas that arise when studying people with disabilities. Key concerns include obtaining informed, voluntary consent, maintaining mindfulness throughout the research process, managing participants’ expectations, and building trusting relationships with them. Researchers must be especially attentive to these issues, given the vulnerabilities and specific needs of this group. To address these concerns, this paper suggests that researchers practice diplomacy, foster positive relationships, and respect diversity. Building trust with participants is essential, and communication plays a crucial role in this process. Researchers must be sensitive to participants’ unique challenges and socio-economic backgrounds to ensure respectful and inclusive interactions. In conclusion, while ethical approaches are generally consistent across research studies, additional care is required when studying individuals with visual impairments due to their physical limitations in seeing. Researchers and all stakeholders involved in the research process bear the responsibility to design disability studies that explicitly address these ethical concerns and incorporate appropriate strategies to mitigate them, thereby ensuring that the research remains both ethically sound and methodologically robust.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Aguinaldo, J. P. (2022). Ethics review and conversation analysis. Research Ethics, 18(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221116552
Anney, V. N. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 272-281.
Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1-18. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss40/3
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). Information overload: An overview. Oxford University Press.
Bhattarai, P. C. (2013). Ethical practices of educational administrators: Nepalese experience. Journal of Ethical Leadership in Action, 2(1), Article 1. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/ela/vol2/iss1/1
Botes, A. (2000). A comparison between the ethics of justice and the ethics of care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(5), 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01576.x
Bradley, H. (2015). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality. John Wiley & Sons.
Brent, J. J., & Kaska, P. B. (2021). In?Depth interviewing. The Encyclopaedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1, 405-411.
British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethicalguidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Bryen, D. N. (2016). Ethical issues in conducting research involving persons with disability: A view from the past and some new challenges. Ethical Sensitivity: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 4(2), 53-59. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/61757
Cocks, A. J. (2006). The ethical maze: Finding an inclusive path towards gaining children’s agreement to research participation. Childhood, 13(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568206062942
Cook, T., & Inglis, P. (2009). Making our Own Decisions: Researching the Process of ‘Being Informed’ with People with Learning Difficulties. Research Ethics, 5(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500204
Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2020). Teacher educators’ perspectives and experiences towards differentiated instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 781-798. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13448a
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)
Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen (Eds. & Trans.), Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 43–115). MIT Press.
Heijden, I V.D, Harries. J., & Abrahams, N. (2019). Ethical considerations for disability-inclusive gender-based violence research: Reflections from a South African qualitative case study. Global public health, 14(5), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1542015
Hugh, B. (2011). Basic concepts in Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Stanford Scholarship Online.
Jacobs. A, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Jenkin, E., Wilson, E., Campain, R., & Clarke, M. (2020). The principles and ethics of including children with disability in child research. Children & Society, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12356
MacNeill, K., Bolt, B., Barrett, E., McPherson, M., Sierra, M., Miller, S., Brown, P., & Wilson, C. (2021). An ethical engagement: Creative practice research, the academy, and professional codes of conduct. Research Ethics, 17(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915950
National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). (2022). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences and the humanities (5th ed.). The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/guidelines/social-sciences-humanities/
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
Pezdek, K., & Doli?ski, W. (2017). Jürgen Habermas and the dilemmas of experience of disability. Nursing Philosophy, 18(4). doi: 10.1111/nup.12171. PMID: 28164412.
Puigvert, L., & Holford, J. (2012). Critical communicative methodology: Including vulnerable voices in research through dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(4), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.733341
Rutakumwa, R., Mugisha, J. O., Bernays, S., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Mbonye, M., & Seeley, J. (2020). Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: A comparative analysis. Qualitative Research, 20(5), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119884806
Sa?kowska, M. (2018). Carrying out research among persons with disabilities and their relatives: Selected ethical issues. Zoon Politikon, 9(1), 200-217.
Sandnes. F.E. (2021). Candidate: A tool for generating anonymous participant-linking IDs in multi-session studies. PLoS ONE, 16(12), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260569
Shrestha, P. (2019). Exploring the learning experiences of girls with visual disability: A case study approach (Unpublished MPhil dissertation). School of Education, Kathmandu University.
Shrestha, P., & Bhattarai, P.?C. (2022). Application of case study methodology in the exploration of inclusion in education. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11461
Sivasubramaniam, S., Dlabolová, D. H., Kralikova, V., & Khan, Z. R. (2021). Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00078-6
Tammeleht, A., & Löfström, E. (2022). Facilitating the development of research ethics and integrity leadership competencies. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00102-3
Tudzi, E., Bugri, J., & Danso, A. (2020). Experiences of students with disabilities in inaccessible built environments: A case study of a student with mobility impairment in a university in Ghana. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.539
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9034-0736