IDENTIFYING PATTERNS OF INTERACTION, LRES AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS IN COLLABORATIVE WRITING: A QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7481-1293
Claudine Benoit Rios
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-2212
Claudio Diaz Larenas
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-2378
Tania Tagle Ochoa
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-1827
Abstract
Collaborative writing involves students working together and dividing tasks to co-construct a text, sharing ideas, negotiating content, and refining language. This approach fosters discussion, peer interaction, critical thinking, and active engagement in the writing process. Language-Related Episodes (LREs) occur during these interactions, where learners focus on specific linguistic aspects, such as grammar, vocabulary, or discourse structure. This study aims at identifying the patterns of interactions and Language Related Episodes that occur during the production of an argumentative essay. The study also seeks to describe students’ perception towards collaborative writing. It follows a qualitative design with 30 pre-service teachers of English from a Chilean university participating. The data collection instruments included a semi-structured interview, an interaction analysis framework based on Storch (2002) and a Language Related Episode identification framework. The results indicated that the most identified patterns of interaction were collaborative, dominant-passive and expert-novice. Regarding Language Related Episodes, it could be observed that participants of the study focused more on grammar and vocabulary. Finally, regarding students' perceptions of collaborative work, it was found that they recognized more advantages than disadvantages. Some of the identified advantages included promoting discussion, resolving doubts, and learning from others. As for the disadvantages, the only one identified was the difficulty in reaching agreements. Collaborative writing fosters meaningful interactions and language development through varied patterns and LREs. Students' positive perceptions highlight their value in enhancing linguistic and communicative skills as well as fostering teamwork, making it a valuable tool for pre-service teacher education.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Ahmadian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2017). The effects of collaborative writing on learners’ accuracy in an EFL context. Applied Research on English Language, 6(2), 139–164.
Ajideh, P., Leitner, G., & Yazdi-Amirkhiz, S. (2016). The influence of collaboration on individual writing quality: The case of Iranian vs. Malaysian college students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 17(17), 1–24.
Alwaleedi, M., Gillies, R., & Hamid, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in Arabic as a second Language (ASL) classrooms: A Mixed-method Study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422
Arciniegas, E., & López, E. (2012). La escritura en el aula universitaria. Estrategias para su regulación. Programa editorial Univalle.
Chen, X., & Lee, I. (2022). Conflicts in peer interaction of collaborative writing: A case study in an EFL context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100910
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37-51.
Cho, J., & Lee, E. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1–20.
D’Espíndula, T., & Sottile, B. (2016). Aspectos éticos e bioéticos na entrevista em pesquisa: impacto na subjetividade. Revista Bioética, 24 (3), 495-502.
Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284-302.
Dyson, A. (2016). Child cultures, schooling, and literacy. Global perspectives on composing unique lives. Routledge.
Fernández, A. (2012). Collaborative dialogue in learner-learner and learner-native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics, 33, 229-256.
Flick, U. (2013). An introduction to qualitative research (5.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hsieh, Y. (2019). Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources. ReCALL, 32(1), 85–105.
Huy, N. (2023). A critical review of collaborative learning in academic writing classes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2023.5.3.1
Jalili, M., & Shahrokhi, M. (2017). The effect of collaborative writing on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 Writing anxiety and attitudes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 203-215.
Jelodar, Z., & Farvardin, M. (2019). Effects of collaborative tasks on EFL learners' written production. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 389-406.
Kleinheksel, A., Tawfik, H., Wyatt, T., & Winston, N. (2020). Demystifying content analysis. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84, 127-137.
Kvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata, S.L.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki?based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120. https://doi.org/10.10125/44613
Liao. B. (2020). Language-related episodes in learner-native speaker collaborative writing interaction. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 17(1), 135-153.
Martins, M., Teixeira, M., & Faneca, R. (2025). Shaping the future of collaborative writing in educational settings: Emerging trends and research opportunities. Sisyphus – Journal of Education, 13(1), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.38156
Martinez, M. (2013). Learners’ engagement with written corrective feedback in CLIL and EFL settings. Language Awareness, 22(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.744374
Martinez, M., Gutiérrez, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2021). Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners: A review of task modality effects. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3(2), 214–245. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20005.mar
Mendonça C., & Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities In ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
Northrup, P. (2002). Online Learners' preferences for interaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 219.
Nosratinia. M., & Razavi, F. (2016). Writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency among EFL learners: Inspecting their interaction with learners’ degree of creativity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6 (5), 1043-1052.
Sadaghian.S., & Marandi, S. (2021). Fostering language learner autonomy through interdependence: the power of wikis. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 194-208.
Storch, N. (1998). A classroom-base study: Insights from a collaborative text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52(4), 291–300.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–58.
Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes: And future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275-288.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing Learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31-48.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effect of collaboration. In M. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157-177). Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In In H. Byrnes (Ed.), (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects’ in M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (eds): Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Longman, pp. 99–118.
Talib, T., & Cheung, Y. (2017). Collaborative writing in classroom instruction: A Synthesis of Recent Research. The English Teacher, 46, 43-57.
Valles, M. (2002). Entrevistas cualitativas. CIS.
Veidenberg, I. (2017). Differences between individually and collaboratively written texts in case of Estonian upper secondary school EFL students [Master’s thesis, University of Tartu].
Vrasidas. C., & McIsaac, M. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22-36.
Wall, L. (2018). Collaborative writing (Neomy Storch, Ed.). Language Teaching, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 605-635.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005
Zhai, M. (2021). Collaborative writing in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: Learners’ perceptions and motivations. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100836
Zhang, X. (2019). Foreign language anxiety and foreign language performance: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 763-781.
Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2021). Implementing collaborative writing in Chinese EFL classrooms: Voices from tertiary teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.