Reproductive Capabilities of Women with Congenital Malformation of the Reproductive System: A Diffractive Reading through Karen Barad’s Agential Realism.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Introduction: Biomedical and sociological investigative efforts have proposed analysis on female infertility whose limitations have contributed to the perpetuation of essentialist understandings about bodies and their properties. Goals: The study aims to show how the modality of new materialism proposed by the North American physicist and feminist Karen Barad, named agential realism, and the analytical method of diffractive reading systematized by the author allow us to build alternative understandings about female infertility, pointing out ways to overcome the shortcomings that are present both in biomedical and sociological approaches on the subject. Methods: The research mobilizes a qualitative methodological approach of multiple case study, using semi-structured interviews with three women diagnosed as infertile due to Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome (MRKH). We conduct the analytical procedure of diffractive reading, in order to read the experiences of the participants through some of the ontological positions derived by Karen Barad from Niels Bohr's theorizations about quantum mechanics. Results: From the diffractive reading of the experiences of the three participants through the light of the Baradian theoretical propositions, an alternative understanding of the reproductive capabilities of women with MRKH emerges, which identifies these bodily attributes as ontologically relational and constantly changing socio-material phenomena, whose technological, political, economic, and social complexity makes any kind of biological essentialism unsustainable. Conclusions: Barad's agential realism and her method of diffractive reading invite us to resist the temptation to attribute to bodies characteristics and capabilities that are constant, universal, and independent from the material-discursive contexts and apparatuses that produce them, appearing as promising theoretical and methodological tools for qualitative investigative efforts that, starting from the social sciences, focus on the topics of reproductive health, the body, and its properties.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Ariza, L. (2014). La construcción narrativa de la infertilidad. Mujeres que narran la experiencia de no poder concebir. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad, 00(18), 41-73.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2012). Intra-actions [Interview with Adam Kleinman]. Mousse Magazine, 34, 76–81.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–31.
Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (pp. 201-241). Illinois: Open Court.
Butler, J. (2018). Corpos em aliança e a política das ruas: notas para uma teoria performativa da assembleia. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734-741.
Daza, S. & Huckaby, M. F. (2014). Terra Incognita: Em-bodied data analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 801-810.
Evans, T. N., Poland, M. L., & Boving, R. L. (1981). Vaginal malformations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 141(8), 910–920.
Foucault, M. (2000). Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
Haraway, D. (2018). Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium.FemaleMan-Meets-OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Héritier, F. (1984). Sterilité, aridité, sécheresse: quelques invariants de la pensée symbolique. In M. Augé & C. Erzlich (Eds.), Le sens du mal: anthropologie, histoire, sociologie de la maladie (pp.123-154). Paris: Èditions des Archives Contemporaines.
Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741–748.
Kirby, V. (2017). Foreword. In V. Kirby (Ed.), What if Culture was Nature all Along? (pp. viii-xii), Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Latour, B. (1994). Jamais Fomos Modernos: ensaio de antropologia simétrica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lemke, T. (2014). New Materialisms: Foucault and the ‘Government of Things’. Theory, Culture and Society, 32(4), 3-25.
Manzini, E. J. (1990). A entrevista na pesquisa social. Didática, 00(26/27), 149-158.
Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Mukerji, C. (2015). The Material Turn. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp.1-13). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Rabelo, D. A. (2018). A Construção do Estigma para mulheres com Síndrome de Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser na Mídia – Perspectiva de Corpo. Dissertação de Mestrado, Programa de Pós-graduação em Bioética, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Brasília.
Richards, E. G., Agatisa, P. K., Davis, A. C., Flyckt, R., Mabel, H., Falcone, T., Tzakis, A., & Farrell, R. M. (2019). Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 10(1), 23-35.
Springgay, S. & Truman, S. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. New York: Routledge.
St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New Empiricisms and New Materialisms. Cultural Studies ? Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
Vinuto, J. (2014). Amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas, 22(44), 203-220.
Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.