THINKING WITH DELEUZIAN-GUATTARIAN THEORY: AN EXPLORATION OF RHIZOMATIC LANGUAGE LEARNING
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
In today's unpredictable world, students' learning becomes increasingly non-hierarchical, decentralised, and unexpected. This article explores how the “thinking with theory” approach, using concepts such as the rhizome, deterritorialisation, becoming, nomads, and lines of flight, as developed by Deleuze and Guattari, can help to understand the nature of rhizomatic learning of English among secondary school students (aged 18-19 in grades 11-12, representing the final two years of the four-year gymnasium level in Lithuania) in informal settings. We employed rhizoanalysis, which is based on the principles of the rhizome, including connectivity, heterogeneity, multiplicity, rupture, and cartography. We “plugged in” theory and data to one another, reading data across these theoretical concepts. The qualitative interview study involved 38 students from four Lithuanian gymnasiums. To demonstrate the visualisation of students' learning journeys, we present one student's rhizomatic map. Rhizomatic maps depict the assemblage of English skills (e.g., reading-listening or writing-speaking) and how these skills are connected to various informal learning activities. Thinking with Deleuzian-Guattarian theory enabled us to view the students' learning as a process of change, transformation, and becoming, occurring during non-hierarchical, unpredictable, uncontrolled, and inconsistent learning at home, and when communicating with friends and enjoying physical and virtual journeys. Nomadic behaviour and deterritorialisation mark a transformative process involving the opening up of new creative potential and the emergence of new forms of becoming Self-Other, becoming readers, translators, and artists. Most students learn English informally through activities such as watching films, listening to music and podcasts, playing games, and communicating on social media. This study emphasises the importance of integrating informal learning activities into formal education, even for upper-grade students preparing for high-stakes exams. This study has shown that rhizomatic English learning in an informal context can act as a “war machine” against the state apparatus that maintains structured, controlled, hierarchical education in formal classroom and school settings.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 New Trends in Qualitative Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Benozzo, A. (2021). Post qualitative research: An idea for which the time has come. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420922251
Boileau, T. (2017). Informal learning. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (pp. 194–205). EdTech Books.
Brailas, A. (2020). Rhizomatic learning in action: A virtual exposition for demonstrating learning rhizomes. Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, USA, 1–6.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic education: Community as curriculum. Innovate. Journal of Online Education, 4(5), 1–8. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol4/iss5/2/
Corner, J. (2011). The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, & C. Perkins (Eds.), The map reader: Theories of mapping practice and cartographic representation (pp. 89–101). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch12
Cronje, J. C. (2021). Social distancing close together: The rhizomatic role of WhatsApp in communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2021.112854
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Jackson, A.Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412471510
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2023). Thinking with theory in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kairien?, A., & Mažeikien?, N. (2023). Angl? kalbos rizominio mokymosi kartografija: Einant mokini? nomadišk? klajoni? takais [The cartography of rhizomatic learning of English: Unravelling students' nomadic wanderings]. Pedagogika / Pedagogy, 150 (2), 191– 211 https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2023.150.10
Kairiené, A., & Mažeikien?, N. (2024). Lines of flight and nomadic trajectories: Visualising rhizomatic learning with cartography. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.169.186
Lian, A., & Pineda, M. (2014). Rhizomatic learning: “As… when… and if…” A strategy for the ASEAN community in the 21st century. Beyond Words: A Journal on Language Education, Applied Linguistics and Curriculum & Instruction, 2, 1–27.
Lu, L., Chang, H., & Hung, M.-H. (2022). Rhizomatic encounters with inter/transmedia art: A pedagogy for learning and teaching experiential contemporary art. Studies in Art Education, 63(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2021.2007726
Martin, A., & Kamberelis, G. (2013). Mapping not tracing: Qualitative educational research with political teeth. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788756
Masny, D. (2015). Rhizoanalysis as education research. In M.A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–5).
Mwita, K. M. (2022). Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1776
Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., & Sherborne, T. (2014). Knowledge cartography: Software tools and mapping techniques (Advanced information and knowledge processing). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6470-8
Sanford, K., Merkel, L., & Madill, L. (2011). 'There’s no fixed course': Rhizomatic learning communities in adolescent videogaming. The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association, 5 (8), 50–70.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36 (3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00068.x
St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–625). SAGE.
Tiwari, V., & Tripathi, S. (2024). Sampling designs: probability and non-probability sampling. In P. L. Patel, N. K. Mishra, S. Chintawar, D. B. Suryawanshi, & S. Tripathi (Eds.), Research methodology in extension education (pp. 75–85).
Wiles, R. (2013). What are qualitative research ethics? Bloomsbury Publishing.
Windsor, J. (2015). Desire lines: Deleuze and Guattari on molar lines, molecular lines, and lines of flight. New Zealand Sociology, 30, 156–171.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-8732