##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Nonceba Cynthia Mbeshu-Mhlauli

Resumen

Despite the increasing marginalisation of local heritage within formal curricula, which often prioritises Western-centric pedagogical models, this study explores the sustainability of Indigenous visual arts through a collaborative, practice-based intervention. Adopting a qualitative collaborative action research design, the research purposefully selected three Creative Arts teachers, three Indigenous Knowledge experts, and one academic researcher who engaged with learners in rural school settings to develop strategies for sustainable Indigenous visual arts instruction. The study generated robust data through participant observation, field notes, photographs, audio and visual recordings, and teacher reflective journals, which were subsequently analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings are organised around three interrelated themes. First, a shift from abstract, theory-driven instruction to embodied, artefact-based learning highlights the fundamental importance of observation, imitation, and repetition in Indigenous pedagogies, methods often overlooked in traditional formal assessment. Second, the study demonstrates the critical repositioning of Indigenous Knowledge experts as legitimate pedagogical authorities. This shift challenges dominant, Eurocentric notions of qualification by foregrounding mastery of practice and lived experience as essential instructional assets. Third, the research highlights the necessity of school–community collaboration in enabling the authentic and sustainable integration of Indigenous Knowledge, ensuring that art education remains culturally resonant. The discussion is framed through the lenses of Cultural Interface and Communicative Action Theory, illustrating how classrooms function as dialogic spaces where disparate knowledge systems are negotiated and co-constructed. Based on these insights, the study argues that long-term sustainability depends on a holistic approach that integrates transformative pedagogy, institutional recognition of Indigenous expertise, and active community partnerships. It concludes that such indigenisation not only enhances cultural relevance but also fosters the development of globally competent, culturally grounded learners, providing a transferable framework for educational decolonisation in postcolonial contexts.




Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Sección
Estudios empíricos con reflexión metodológica

Cómo citar

Referencias

Asante, M. K. (1991). The Afrocentric Idea in Education. The journal of negro education, 60(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295608

Blose, P., & Gumbo, M. (2024). The incorporation of Indigenous knowledge into graphic design technology. South African Journal of Education, 44(si1), S1–S10.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 11(4), 589–597.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Chilton, G., & Leavy, P. (2014). Arts-Based Research Practice. In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research.

Chishti, R., Anwar, M., Anwar, A., Ali, S., Yousaf, F., & Mughal, Z. (2022). Visual Arts Pedagogy And Its Impact On Creativity And Problem Solving Ability Of Elementary School Students. Webology, 19(3).

Cindi, L. (2021). Incorporating African Indigenous knowledge systems into the basic education curriculum: Experiences from two schools in the Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces, South Africa.

Corcoran, K., & Sim, C. (2009). Pedagogical reasoning, creativity, and cooperative learning in the visual art classroom. International Journal of Education through Art, 5(1), 51–61.

Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34.

de Sousa Santos, B. (2015). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.

Department of Basic Education [DBE]. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Life skills (Grades 4–6). Government Printer. https://www.education.gov.za

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action.

Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon press.

Keane, M., Raciti, M., van der Westhuizen, G., Motala, S., Stanton, S., Gilbey, K., Manathunga, C., Qi, J., & Msimango, S. (2023). Indigenous knowledge systems in South Africa and Australia: Transforming doctoral education. Curriculum perspectives, 43(Suppl 1), 83–93.

Kemmis, S. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In: The Sage handbook of qualitative research/Sage.

Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational action research, 14(4), 459–476.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research (Vol. 200). Springer.

Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2011). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Key works in critical pedagogy (pp. 285–326). SensePublishers Rotterdam.

Korkiamäki, R., & Kaukko, M. (2023). Faceless, voiceless child–Ethics of visual anonymity in research with children and young people. Childhood, 30(1), 55-70.

Kovach, M. (2021). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.

Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Mhlauli, N., & Fikelepi-Twani, Z. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions on incorporating Indigenous knowledge into Creative Arts teaching and learning methods in selected South African schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 121–138.

Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian journal of Indigenous education, 36(S1), 7–14.

Nantwi, W. K., Afful, P., & Asare-Ababio, P. (2019). Pedagogical practices in Creative Arts: Using the right approach for effective delivery. European Journal of Education Studies.

Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21.

Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., & Erickson, F. (2016). The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in education, 40(1), 356–401.

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples.

South African Cultural Observatory [SACO]. (2024). Indigenous knowledge as content for the cultural and creative industries (SACO Research Report). South African Cultural Observatory. https://www.southafricanculturalobservatory.org.za/report/Indigenous-knowledge-as-content-for-the-cultural-and-creative-industries

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods.

Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robinson, J., & Heath, S. (2012). Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect,‘voice’and protection. International journal of social research methodology, 15(1), 41-53.

Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., & Renold, E. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research.

Wilson, S., & Wilson, P. (1998). Relational accountability to all our relations. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22(2).

Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., Durante, A., Escalante, E. L., Inayat, S., & Ali, P. (2023). Proposing the “MIRACLE” narrative framework for providing thick description in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069221147162.