Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Researcher Identity in Vocational Higher Education
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumen
This empirical study with methodological reflection examines how postgraduate research education shaped six lecturers’ researcher, academic, and professional identities within a Vocational and Professional Higher Education and Training (VPET) institution whose provision extends through Level 8. It also examines what the study demonstrates about conducting Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) as a practitioner-researcher in an institutionally bounded setting. Six purposively selected lecturers participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The dataset was analysed through Braun and Clarke’s reflexive approach, with MAXQDA 2022 (VERBI Software) supporting transcript organisation, coding, memoing, retrieval, comparison of coded segments, and iterative review of developing themes. The analysis generated four interpretive themes: research engagement as identity transformation; conditions that enable researcher-becoming; ambivalence, workload and constraint; and research culture as relational infrastructure. Participants described growing methodological confidence, stronger identification as researchers, and greater capacity to support students, while also negotiating time, workload, competing responsibilities, and uneven structural support. Methodologically, the study demonstrates that RTA requires explicit attention to researcher positionality, relational ethics, deductive identifiability, and the distinction between software-supported data management and interpretive theme generation. A worked analytic pathway makes the movement from participant excerpts to codes, and final themes visible without treating themes as emergent rather than generated. The methodological reflection further explains why sample adequacy is better reasoned through information power and analytic depth than through saturation claims in this form of thematic analysis. The article concludes with transferable guidance for practitioner-researchers conducting reflexive, ethically attentive RTA in vocational higher education and similarly bounded professional settings.
Descargas
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Cómo citar
Derechos de autor 2026 New Trends in Qualitative Research
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
openAccess
openAccess
Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
Benson, A., & Blackman, D. (2003). Can Research Methods Ever Be Interesting? Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787403004001004
Booth, C., & Harrington, J. (2003). Research methods modules and undergraduate business research: An investigation. The International Journal of Management Education, 3(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.33.78
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021c). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Edwards, D. F., & Thatcher, J. (2004). A student-centred tutor-led approach to teaching research methods. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877042000206750
Feather, D. (2010). A whisper of academic identity: An HE in FE perspective. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596741003790740
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.
Kiley, M., & Mullins, G. (2005). Supervisors’ Conceptions of Research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109550
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Murtonen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Difficulties Experienced by Education and Sociology Students in Quantitative Methods Courses. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058064
Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (2008). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9019-4
Said, A. (2022). Vocational Teacher Educators’ Role Identity: A Case Study in Malta. Qualitative Sociology Review, 18(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.1.03
Sinclair, A., & Webb, S. (2020). Academic identity in a changing Australian higher education space: The higher education in vocational institution perspective. International Journal of Training Research, 18(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1824874
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [Computer software]. VERBI Software.
Winn, S. (1995). Learning by doing: Teaching research methods through student participation in a commissioned research project. Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381703