IMPLEMENTING THE RESULTS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: CONTRIBUTIONS, CHALLENGES AND TRENDS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The rapid advance of research and the worldwide proliferation of its results are an indisputable gain for the development of society, with clear translations in technological, social and human advances. This increase in studies and the dissemination of results is a challenge for researchers who, on the one hand, have access to a variety of studies on a given topic, but who are still faced with the challenge of getting the results of their research to the citizen and to the society. This difficulty cuts across all areas of knowledge and is particularly noticeable when it comes to implementing the results of qualitative studies. Despite the growing acceptance of knowledge produced in the constructivist and interpretivist research paradigms, guidelines and evidence synthesis studies continue to favor positivist models, with losses in understanding the complexity and richness of social and human phenomena, losing valuable insights for understanding events, in isolation or in complementarity with quantitative approaches. What is presented in this article aims not only to discuss research designs, but also to redefine how evidence synthesis and the respective scientific method are interconnected, to do so, and to reconsider the models that are used to transfer and implement ‘Quali knowledge’ in contexts with disparate cultural specificities and available resources
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Agostinho, I., Reis, N., Sousa, L., Ferreira, R., Miranda da Silva, M., & Baixinho, C. (2024). Implementing Quali Evidence - A Challenge For Evidence Ecosystems. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 20(3), e1063. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.20.3.2024.e1063
Apóstolo, J. (2017). Síntese da evidência no contexto da translação da ciência. Coimbra, Portugal: Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (ESEnfC).
Apóstolo, J. L., & Silva, R. C. (2021). Ciência cidadã e aberta em tempos de pandemia!. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 5(Supl. 8), e21EDS8. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV21EDS8
Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, Ó., Marques F.M., Oliveira, E., Presado M.H., Cardoso M., Sousa, A., & Nascimento T. (2022). Síntese, transferência e implementação de evidência qualitativa para a melhoria das práticas e da decisão clínica. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 13. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e568
Beck, S., Mahdad, M., Beukel, K., & Poetz, M. (2019). The Value of Scientific Knowledge Dissemination for Scientists—A Value Capture Perspective. Publications. 2019; 7(3):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030054
Baumbusch, J.L., Kirkham, S.R., Khan, K.B., McDonald, H., Semeniuk, P., Tan, E., & Anderson, J.M. (2008). Pursuing Common Agendas: A Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation between Research and Practice in Clinical Settings. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 130–40. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20242
Cardoso, M., Baixinho, C.L., Ferreira, O., Nascimento, P., Pedrosa, R., Gonçalves, P. (2021). Learning evidence based practice through involvement in investigation activities - the self-perception of students. Cogit. Enferm. 26:e79806. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/ce.v26i0.79806
Cartabellotta, A., & Tilson, J. K. (2019). The ecosystem of evidence cannot thrive without efficiency of knowledge generation, synthesis, and translation. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 110, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.008
Chambers, D.A., Glasgow, R.E., & Stange, K.C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 16(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117
Hamilton, A.B., & Finley, E.P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Herfeld, C., & Lisciandra, C. (2019). Knowledge transfer and its contexts. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.06.002
Hoddinott, P., Pollock, A., O'Cathain, A., Boyer, I., Taylor, J., MacDonald, C., Oliver, S., & Donovan, J. L. (2018). How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research. F1000Research, 7, 752. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15162.1
Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof.;26(1):13-24. http://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47.
Dekker, I., & Meeter, M. (2022) Evidence-based education: Objections and future directions. Frontiers in Education. 7:941410. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.941410
Janati, A., Hasanpoor, E., Hajebrahimi, S., Sadeghi-Bazargani, H., & Khezri, A. (2018). An Evidence-Based Framework for Evidence-Based Management in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi Study. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 28(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v28i3.8
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. The European journal of general practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Kucharska, W. (2017). Relationships between Trust and Collaborative Culture in The Context of Tacit Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation. 13(4), 61-78. 25, 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3109309
Loura, D. S., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2021). Nursing students' learning from involvement in research projects: an integrative literature review. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 75(1), e20210053. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Liu, F., Lu, Y., & Wang, P. (2020) Why Knowledge Sharing in Scientific Research Teams Is Difficult to Sustain: An Interpretation From the Interactive Perspective of Knowledge Hiding Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:537833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537833
Miranda da Silva, M., Soares Lavareda Baixinho, C. R., Mendes Marques, M. F., Oliveira, C. S., de Moura Bubadué, R., Franco de Souza, S. V., & Cabral, I. E. (2024). Promoting knowledge translation: An ecosystem approach to evidence in health. Heliyon, 10(7), e28871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28871
Muller, I., Santer, M., Morrison, L., Morton, K., Roberts, A., Rice, C., Williams, M., & Yardley, L. (2019). Combining qualitative research with PPI: reflections on using the person-based approach for developing behavioural interventions. Research involvement and engagement, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0169-8
Presado, M.H., Baixinho, C.L., & Oliveira, E.S.F. (2021). Qualitative research in pandemic times. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74(suppl 1):e74Suppl101. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.202174Suppl101.
Pope, C., Mays, N., & Popay, J. (2007). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Prihodova, L., Guerin, S., Tunney, C., & Kernohan, W.G. (2019). Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13836
Proctor, E., Ramsey, A. T., Saldana, L., Maddox, T. M., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2022). FAST: A Framework to Assess Speed of Translation of Health Innovations to Practice and Policy. Global implementation research and applications, 2(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00045-4
Proctor, E. K., & Rosen, A. (2008). From Knowledge Production to Implementation: Research Challenges and Imperatives. Research on social work practice, 18(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507302263
Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International journal of preventive medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19
Thirsk, L. M., & Clark, A. M. (2017). Using Qualitative Research for Complex Interventions: The Contributions of Hermeneutics. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917721068
Vandvik, P. O., Brandt, L., Alonso-Coello, P., Treweek, S., Akl, E. A., Kristiansen, A., Fog-Heen, A., Agoritsas, T., Montori, V. M., & Guyatt, G. (2013). Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest, 144(2), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-0746
World Health Organization (2021). Evidence, policy, impact. WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yardley, L., Bradbury, K., & Morrison, L. (2021). Using qualitative research for intervention development and evaluation. In P. M. Camic (Ed.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (2nd ed., pp. 263–282). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-013
Similar Articles
- Inês Agostinho, Neuza Reis, Luis Sousa, Rogério Ferreira, Marcelle Miranda da Silva, Cristina Baixinho, IMPLEMENTING QUALI EVIDENCE - A CHALLENGE FOR EVIDENCE ECOSYSTEMS , New Trends in Qualitative Research: Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024): New Trends in Qualitative Research
- Inês Agostinho, Neuza Reis, Luís Sousa, Rogério Ferreira, Marcelle Miranda da Silva, Cristina Lavareda Baixinho, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AND THE DESIGN OF HEALTH INTERVENTIONS , New Trends in Qualitative Research: Vol. 18 (2023): Qualitative Research in Healthcare (Book Series)
- Cristina Baixinho, Óscar Ferreira, Fátima Marques, Ellen Synthia de Oliveira, Maria Helena Presado, Mário Cardoso, Armando David Sousa, Tiago Nascimento, Synthesis, transfer and implementation of qualitative evidence to improve clinical practice and decision , New Trends in Qualitative Research: Vol. 13 (2022): Qualitative Research in Health: Advances and Challenges (Book Series)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.