Assessment and Teaching in the Postgraduate Course in Health Education, Different Moments of the Same Process: A Case Study
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The work presents a case study on the implementation of hybrid teaching with active methodologies for the training of skills in the teaching of evaluation in the postgraduate course in Health Education. postgraduate course in Health Education on skills training in the teaching of student assessment. This is a single case study (instrumental, educational type and with a mixed approach) developed from a practical activity offered to 20 graduate students in the discipline of Evaluation in Health Education. The active face-to-face methodologies were interspersed with moments of online production. As instruments, a semi-structured questionnaire, the Kirkpatrick training evaluation method and the teacher's diary were used. The constructed data were submitted to the technique of content analysis and statistical analysis. Only 20% of graduate students reported previous knowledge in assessment methods. All considered the strategy used adequate and relevant for teaching the proposed content and reported the use of learning in their work. The study demonstrated that the offer through active methodologies allows to solidify the desired content and to increase the interaction between the team in the academic environment.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Auto, B. S. et al. (2020). A pesquisa-ação educacional no desenvolvimento docente em métodos avaliativos para o médico residente. Investigação qualitativa em saúde: avanços e desafios. Lisboa: Ludomedia.
Barbosa, E. F., & Moura, D. G. (2013). Metodologias ativas de aprendizagem na Educação Profissional e Tecnológica. B. Tec. Senac, 39(2), 48-67.
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool. Atlanta: CDC.
Chizzotti, A. 2011. Pesquisa qualitativa em ciências humanas e sociais. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Ensino híbrido: uma inovação disruptiva? Uma introdução à teoria dos híbridos. Clayton Christensen Institute. Recuperado de https://porvir.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/PT_Is-K-12-blended-learning-disruptive-Final.pdf.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Dewey, J. (1959). Vida e educação. São Paulo: Acional.
Faimer Brasil. (2016). Glossário de métodos de avaliação dos estudantes. Recuperado de https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4511218/mod_folder/content/0/Glossario_Instrumentos%20de%20avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20FAIMER%20BRASIL%202016.pdf?forcedownload=1
Fortuna, T. R. (2001). Formando professores na universidade para brincar. In Santos, S. A ludicidade como ciência. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
Freire, P. (2009). Pedagogia do oprimido. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Kirkpatrick, J., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2009). The Kirkpatrick four levels: a fresh look after 50 years 1959-2009. Kirkpatrick Partners. Recuperado de http://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/Portals/0/Resources/Kirkpatrick%20Four%20Levels%20white%20paper.pdf.
Mendonça, E. T., Cotta, R. M. M., Lelis, V. P., & Carvalho Junior, P. M. (2015). Assessment of professionalism in students of health-related courses: a systematic review. Interface, 2015.
Miller, G. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65, 63-67.
Moran, J. M. (2015). Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. In Souza, C. A., & Morales, O. E. T. Convergências midiáticas, educação e cidadania: aproximações jovens. V. 2. Ponta Grossa: Foca Foto; Proex UEPG. p. 15-33.
Morin, E. (2002). Ciência com Consciência. 6ª. Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2014). Assessing health professional education: workshop summary. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK248052/.
Pádua, E. M. de, Carlos, D. M., Ferriani M. G. C. (2017). Estudos de Caso: Informações e Registros como critérios de consistência e credibilidade em abordagens qualitativas. Lisboa. Ludomedia
Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: a review of research in assessment and evaluation in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1008-1032.
Preston, R. et al. (2020). Exploring the impact of assessment on medical student’s learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 109-124.
Souza, R. G. S. (2012). Atributos fundamentais dos procedimentos de avaliação. In Tibério, I. F. L. C. et al. Avaliação Prática de Habilidades Clínicas em Medicina. São Paulo: Ed. Atheneu. p. 2-11.
Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5-8.
Valente, J. A. (2014). Blended learning e as mudanças no ensino superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Educar em revista, 4, 79-97.
Valente, J. A., Almeida, M. E. B., & Geraldini, A. F. S. (2017). Metodologias ativas: das concepções às práticas em distintos níveis de ensino. Rev. Diálogo Educ., 17, 455-478.
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Assessing profess competence: from methods to programs. Med Educ, 39, 309-317.
Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudos de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.