From Integration to Inclusion: Case study in Portugal
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This paper focuses on a School Group in Southern Portugal, where there are wide sociocultural as well as social origin diversities. This case study followed Stake’s triangle, promoting the interaction among document analysis, observation, and semi structured interviews. However, the methodology had obstacles in its application since the pandemic led to lockdown and intermittent school closure. As a result, the first author used the supplementary resource to her personal archive of observation. Interviews were limited to remote technologies and often the use of obligatory masks. These were some obstacles to direct social contact among subjects, recommended solely in exceptional situations. The direct observation and interviews in situ are highly advisable in a qualitative research project. Results show that the intermediate team understood the differences between integration and inclusiveness. Documents were coherent with legislation and norms. The Support Multidisciplinary Team to Inclusive Education established a network among schools, families, and communities to reach the best solutions for each student. Despite of difficulties to change well rooted practices and attitudes, most of the educators agreed that this School Group was in the right way to inclusive schools. Nevertheless, a small group applied the inclusiveness concept to special education only. This bypass to the concept’s application deviates from the spirit of the Incheon Conference, so restricting its sense.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
openAccess
Bardin, L. (2015). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bogdan, R., & Blinken, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto Editora.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La reproduction : Éléments pour une Théorie du Système d’Enseignement. Minuit.
Cambi, F. (2001). Intercultura: Fondamenti Pedagogice. Roma: Carocci.
Casale, S., Tella, L., & Fioravanti, G. (2013). Preference for online social interactions among young people: direct and indirect effects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 524-529. Doi: 10.1016/j.oaid.2012.10.023
Decreto-Lei nº 3/2008 de 7 de janeiro (2008). Diário da República, nº 4/2008, Série I de 2008-01-07. Lisboa, Ministério da Educação.
Decreto-Lei nº 54/2018 de 6 de julho (2018). Diário da República, nº 129/2018, Série I de 2018-07- 06. Lisboa, Ministério da Educação.
Decreto-Lei nº 55/2018 de 6 de julho (2018a). Diário da República, nº 129/2018, Série I de 2018-07- 06. Lisboa, Ministério da Educação.
Ganascia, J.-G. (2018). Sciences in silico. In Y. Zarka, S. Taussig, & C. Godina, C. (Eds), Les révolutions du XXIe siècle (pp. 151-162). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Gomes, C. (2012). A educação em novas perspectivas sociológicas (4ª ed.). EPU.
Hall, E.T. (1990). The silent language. Anchor.
Lira, A., & Gomes, C. (2018). Violence in schools: what are the lessons for teacher education? Ensaio: Avaliação de Políticas Públicas em Educação, 26(100), 759-779. Doi: 10.1590/s0104-50104-403201800260157err.
Mead, M. (2001). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive Youth for Western Civilisation. Harper-Perennial.
Patton, M. (2020). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
Postman, N. (1994). The disappearance of childhood (2nd ed.). Vintage.
Qvortrup, A., & Qvortrup, L. (2017). Inclusion: Dimensions of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7): 803-817.
Ribeiro, D. (2020). Diários índios: os Urubus-Kaapor. Global.
Schuelka, M.J., & Engsig, T.T. (2020). On the question of educational purpose: complex educational system analysis for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7): 803-817.
Stake, R. (2007). A arte da investigação com estudos de caso. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Unesco (2011). International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 2011. Montreal, Unesco Institute for Statistics, 2011. Recuperado de: international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf (unesco.org).
Unesco (2015). Incheon Declaration: Education 2030: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Paris, Unesco, UNDP, UNFPA, Unicef, UN Women, UNHCR, World Bank Group. Recuperado de Incheon Declaration: Education 2030: Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All - UNESCO Digital Library.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-6914