Advancing Multi-Method Qualitative Research: A Study of Brazilian Entrepreneurship in Portugal
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-0938
Marcelo Ferreira da Costa
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5038-4053
Eduardo Picanço Cruz
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-3256
Susana Cristina Serrano Fernandes Rodrigues
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-7001
Irene Dobarrio Machado Ciccarino
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-4154
Resumen
The growing presence of Brazilian migrants in Portugal has stimulated new research on migrant entrepreneurship, yet important gaps remain regarding how entrepreneurial trajectories are constructed and interpreted within specific migration contexts. Existing studies often rely predominantly on either quantitative surveys or qualitative case analyses, which may limit the capacity to capture both structural patterns and lived experiences. This study’s primary contribution lies in demonstrating a transferable multi-method qualitative design that integrates survey-based profiling with Gioia-based inductive analysis. The study aims to analyse the pathways of Brazilian entrepreneurs in Portugal, focusing on motivational drivers, sociodemographic characteristics, economic integration strategies, and the challenges encountered in the process of establishing businesses. Data were collected between July 2024 and March 2025 through a combination of surveys with 667 Brazilian immigrants and 55 in-depth interviews with entrepreneurs, complemented by field observations and documentary sources from social networks, consulates, and migrant associations. Quantitative data were examined through descriptive statistical analysis to outline the sociodemographic profile of migrants and identify patterns of entrepreneurial activity. Qualitative data were analysed using the Gioia method, supported by MAxQDA software, enabling the identification of first-order concepts, second-order themes, and aggregate dimensions that reveal recurring patterns in entrepreneurial experiences. The triangulation of multiple sources and analytical strategies strengthened the robustness and interpretive depth of the findings. The analysis identified two predominant entrepreneurial trajectories: opportunity-driven entrepreneurs who planned both migration and business creation, and necessity-driven entrepreneurs who developed businesses as adaptive strategies for economic integration. Methodologically, the study demonstrates how the articulation between survey data and inductive qualitative coding can enhance the interpretation of migrant entrepreneurial processes, offering a replicable approach for qualitative and mixed-method research in migration and entrepreneurship studies.
Descargas
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Cómo citar
Derechos de autor 2026 New Trends in Qualitative Research
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
openAccess
openAccess
Baycan-Levent, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Characteristics of migrant entrepreneurship in Europe. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21(4), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903020060
Carvalho, F. C. (2002). A crítica da sociologia econômica à abordagem econômica convencional. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 6(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-98482002000100004
Corrêa, V. S., Vale, M. P., & Guimarães, L. O. (2020). Embeddedness e empreendedorismo: Um ensaio teórico. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 22(3), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4078
Desiderio, M. V. (2014). Policies to support immigrant entrepreneurship. Migration Policy Institute.
Dheer, R. J. (2024). Cultural diversity: An impetus to economic growth–under what conditions? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 36(7–8), 855–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2290741
Fairlie, R. W., & Fossen, F. M. (2020). Defining opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship: Two components of business creation. In S. W. Polachek & K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Change at home, in the labor market, and on the job (pp. 253–289). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Falcão, R. P. Q., Cruz, E., Costa Filho, M., & Elo, M. (2024). Researching hard-to-reach populations: lessons learned from dispersed migrant communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 44(1/2), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2023-0134
Falcão, R. P. de Q., Machado, M. M., Cruz, E. P., & Hossein, C. S. (2021). Mixed embeddedness of Brazilian entrepreneurs in Toronto. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(7), 1724–1750. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2020-0527
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958
Johnson, J. M., & Rowlands, T. (2012). The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium,
J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 99–113). SAGE Publications.
Jones, T., & Ram, M. (2007). Re-embedding the ethnic business agenda. Work, Employment and Society, 21(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007080014
Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2014). Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5–6), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.950697
Kaup, B. Z. (2015). Markets, embeddedness, and elites: The case of Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives, 42(5), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14547514
Kloosterman, R. C. (2010). Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analyzing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220488
Kloosterman, R. C., & Rath, J. (2003). Immigrant entrepreneurs: Venturing abroad in the age of globalisation. Berg.
Kloosterman, R., & Rath, J. (2010). Shifting landscapes of immigrant entrepreneurship. In OECD (Ed.), Open for business: Migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries (pp. 101–123). OECD Publishing.
Kloosterman, R. C., & Rath, J. (2018). Mixed embeddedness revisited: A conclusion to the symposium. Sociologica, 12, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.6092/1971-8853/8625
Kloosterman, R. C., van der Leun, J., & Rath, J. (1999). Mixed embeddedness: (In)formal economic activities and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00194
Krippner, G. R., & Alvarez, A. S. (2007). Embeddedness and the intellectual projects of economic sociology.
Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131647
Langevang, T., Gough, K. V., Yankson, P. W. K., Owusu, G., & Osei, R. (2015). Bounded entrepreneurial vitality: The mixed embeddedness of female entrepreneurship. Economic Geography, 91(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12092
Light, I. (1972). Ethnic enterprise in America: Business and welfare among Chinese, Japanese, and Blacks. University of California Press.
Macdonald, D. (1971). Economic theories and social structure. Free Press.
Nathan, M., & Lee, N. (2013). Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Firm-level evidence from London. Economic Geography, 89(4), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12016
OECD. (2019). The missing entrepreneurs 2019: Policies for inclusive entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3ed84801-en
Oliveira, C. R. (2007). Understanding the diversity of immigrant entrepreneurial strategies. In L. P. Dana (Ed.), Handbook of research on ethnic minority entrepreneurship (pp. 61–82). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1944; no DOI)
Ram, M., Jones, T., & Villares-Varela, M. (2017). Migrant entrepreneurship: Reflections on research and practice. International Small Business Journal, 35(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616678051
Ram, M., Theodorakopoulos, N., & Jones, T. (2008). Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment and Society, 22(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017008093479
Rath, J., & Kloosterman, R. (2000). Immigrant entrepreneurship in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(4), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/713680743
Raud, C. (2007). A importância do Estado na abordagem da embeddedness. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 28, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782007000100013
Schrooten, M., Salazar, N. B., & Dias, G. (2016). Living in mobility: Trajectories of Brazilians in Belgium and the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1139443
Sexton, D. L., & Smilor, R. W. (1997). Entrepreneurship 2000. Upstart Publishing.
Silva, H. S., Mota, C. B. da, Cruz, E. P., & Falcão, R. P. Q. (2024). Mixed embeddedness of Brazilian business in the city of Porto. In I. Tulekian, S. Ribeiro, & L. B. Álvares (Eds.), Cultural and linguistic education in the context of migration (pp. 122–138). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Free Press.
Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms. University of Chicago Press.
Solano, G. (2016). Immigrant self-employment and transnational practices: The case of Moroccan entrepreneurs in Amsterdam and Milan. International Review of Sociology, 26(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2016.1145463
Statista. (2023). Foreign residents in Portugal in 2023, by nationality and gender. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1419590/foreign-residents-in-portugal-by-nationality-and-gender/
Vale, M. P. (2014). Embeddedness e desenvolvimento: Uma revisão conceitual. Revista de Desenvolvimento Econômico, 16(30), 145–164.
Vinogradov, E., & Kolvereid, L. (2007). Cultural background, human capital and self-employment rates among immigrants in Norway. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701223113
Waldinger, R. (1990). Ethnic entrepreneurs: Immigrant business in industrial societies. Sage.