##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Ana Isabel Rodrigues https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-9722

Marta Amaral https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8006-7309

Nadja Mlakar https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5778-6303

Pedro Cravo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-1962

João Rodrigues https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-9013

Barbara Pavlakovic Farrell https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-8656

Abstract

Traditional mobility programmes seem to be insufficient to fulfil the desired internationalization of higher education programmes. For this reason, other forms of internationalization need to be explored and addressed, such as ‘internationalization at home’ (IaH), a concept that has attracted the attention of a significant number of researchers over the years. Considering this, the aim of this paper is to present an example of such practices by focusing on the implementation of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) in the context of Tourism degree programmes offered by two institutions: the Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Portugal, and the University of Maribor, Slovenia. Furthermore, the paper intends to highlight the role played by qualitative methods in the design of this COIL programme, titled: “Integral Rural Tourism experiences: lessons from the Alqueva Lake, Portugal, and the Dolenjska region, Slovenia”. To achieve these goals, the paper focuses on: (i) the definition of internationalization at home and COIL, (ii) the topic and structure of this COIL programme, (iii) qualitative methods used in activity design, and on (iv) the evaluation of this initiative. This COIL proved to be a positive experience, as it helped to consolidate an international partnership and to increase the number of students involved in internationalization activities in both Tourism degrees involved. Furthermore, it encouraged students to develop a wide range of skills, such as digital, language and intercultural skills, which are of crucial importance, particularly in the case of Tourism degree programmes. Moreover, qualitative methods were found to be a suitable approach for the design of the tasks proposed. Finally, the limitations identified, related mostly to language difficulties and to the discrepancy in the perception of the proposed activities by students from the two institutions, hinted at the challenging nature of COIL to all involved – both students and teachers.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Empirical Articles

How to Cite

Rodrigues , A. I., Amaral , M., Mlakar, N., Cravo, P., Rodrigues , J., & Pavlakovic Farrell, B. (2025). INTERNATIONALIZATION AT HOME AMONG TOURISM STUDENTS FROM PORTUGAL AND SLOVENIA: COIL BASED ON QUALITATIVE METHODS. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 21(2), e1221. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.21.2.2025.e1221
References

Allen, J. (2021). What we talk about when we talk about Internationalisation at Home. In A. Manning, & S. Colaiacomo (Eds.), Innovations in Internationalisation at Home (pp. 1-20). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Antoci, A., Brunetti, I., Sacco, P., & Sodini, M. (2021). Student evaluation of teaching, social influence dynamics, and teachers’ choices: An evolutionary model. Journal Evolutionary Economics, 31, 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00705-4

Banks, M. (2018). Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, C.

Beelen, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining Internationalization at Home. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European Higher Education Area. Between Critical Reflections and Future Policies (pp. 59-72). Springer.

Cargan, L. (2007). Doing social research. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Childs, M. (2020). Visual participatory methodology as a prompt for agentic creativity: Revealing views and visions of a teacher learning journey. Journal of Education, 80, 106-125. doi: 10.17159/2520-9868/I80A06

Ciesielska, M., Boström, K.W., & Öhlander, M. (2018). Observation Methods. In M. Ciesielska, & D. Jemielniak, D. (Eds.), Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies (pp.33-52). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência (2024). Estatísticas de Educação 2014-2023. https://www.dgeec.medu.pt/art/ensino-superior/undefined/undefined/65520ab1455255473193d29b

D?wigo?, H., & Barosz, P. (2020). Observation as a research method in social science. Organization and management series, 148, 141-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2020.148.10

European Commission (2024). Learning Mobility. Erasmus+ Public Dashboard. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/eacdashboard/sense/app/c553d9e9-c805-4f7a-90e4-103bd1658077/sheet/4befabf9-d9bb-455f-969b-00dda5fa65ad/state/analysis

Global Learning Conference (2017). https://globallearningconference.org/

Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J. & Tartwijk, J.. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3

Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences. A practical guide. Policy Press.

Kumar, A., & Sharma, A. (2023). Observation Method: A Review Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 7820. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7820

Grzegorz, B., & Costa, A.P. (2023). Qualitative Research in Digital Era: Innovations, Methodologies and Collaborations. Social Sciences,12, 570, 2-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100570

Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Sage.

Mitchell, C. (2008) Getting the picture and changing the picture: Visual methodologies and educational research in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 28, 365-383.

https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v28n3a180

Pardal, L., & Correia, E. (1995). Métodos e Técnicas de Investigação Social. Areal.

PORDATA (2024). https://www.pordata.pt/pt/estatisticas/educacao/do-pre-escolar-ao-secundario/alunos-matriculados-por-sexo-subsistema-de

Rodrigues, A. (2020). Exploring the Use of Visual Methods in Teaching Tourism. In A. Correia & M. Kozak (Eds.), Tourism Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Tourism & Hospitality Journal, 2-3, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354220X15758301241710

Rodrigues, A. I., & Amaral, M. (2020). From Observations and Pictures to Images: Learning Lab@PP2 in Tourism Classes. The Qualitative Report, 25(13), 104-118. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss13/8/

Rossetti, G. (2024) Conceptualising participant observations in festival tourism, Current Issues in Tourism, 27(12), 1884-1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2214850

Rubin, J. (2017). Embedding collaborative online international learning (COIL) at higher education institutions: an evolutionary overview with exemplars. Internationalisation of Higher Education, 2, 27-44. https://bit.ly/3pq2PQK

SiStat (2024). Študenti terciarnega izobraževanja po: VRSTA IZOBRAŽEVANJA, ŠTUDIJSKO LETO. ID of the table: 0955069S. https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/pxweb/sl/Data/-/0955069S.px/table/tableViewLayout2/

Soulé, M. V., Parmaxi, A., & Nicolaou (2024). Internationalization at home in higher education: a systematic review of teaching and learning practices. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 17(7), 29-60. DOI 10.1108/JARHE-10-2023-0484

Universities UK International (2024a). Optimise your Internationalization at Home (IaH). https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/UUKi/IaH%20handbook/Final%20Internationalisation%20at%20Home%20Infographic.pdf

Universities UK International (2024b). Internationalisation at Home (IaH). Introductory Handbook. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/UUKi/IaH%20handbook/IAH%20UUKi%20150124%20v2.pdf

Van der Vaart, G., van Hoven, B., & Huigen, P. P. (2018). Creative and arts-based research methods in academic research. Lessons from a participatory research project in the Netherlands. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum. Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), Art.19.

Wade-Berg. J. (2022). Observation. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady(Eds.) Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 365-375). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_25