CONSTRUCTIVIST GROUNDED THEORY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: PURPOSE, PROCESS, PROMISE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-5119
Abstract
Grounded theory is the most cited qualitative methodology, and its popularity is continually increasing through researchers’ engagement with its constructivist school. In this short paper, I explore its core purpose, history, and development over time, including its ‘contested’ nature, and the constructivist school’s increasing emphasis on social justice-oriented research through its pragmatist roots. Next, I examine constructivist grounded theory’s process, examining its core features and how these translate into specific strategies, as well as constructivist ‘adaptations’. Here, I also consider examples from education and nursing social justice-oriented research that have employed constructivist grounded theory. Finally, I end by considering the promise of the methodology, first by outlining some key challenges in its use, and finally by emphasising the significant potential of the methodology for social justice research into the future.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
openAccess
Abell, J., Locke, A., Condor, S., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 221–244.
Arczynski, A. V., & Morrow, S. L. (2017). The complexities of power in feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 192-205.
Bianchi, M., Balestra, G. L., & Ghirotto, L. (2024). Keeping the constructivism in a constructivist grounded theory: Data collection, writing, and publishing as analytical processes in a study of interprofessional education and collaboration. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 320-335). Routledge.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Prentice Hall.
Bradford, J. (2024). Employing visual methods in constructivist grounded theory research about teacher attrition in primary schools in England. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 168-184). Routledge.
Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice, Oxford University Press.
Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (2007). ‘Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account’. In Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31-57). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509– 535). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2004). Premises, principles, and practices in qualitative research: Revisiting the foundations. Qualitative Health Research, 14(7), 976–993
Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed. 507–535). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualita¬tive analysis. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2009) ‘Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods for the twenty-first century’. In Morse, J., Stern, P., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., and Clarke, A. (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127-154), Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 359–380). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2016). The power of stories and the potential of theorizing for social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin, & M. Guardino (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens (pp. 41–56). Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2017). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 34–45.
Charmaz, K. (2020). “With constructivist grounded theory you can’t hide”: Social justice research and critical inquiry in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 165–176.
Charmaz, K. (2021). The genesis, grounds, and growth of constructivist grounded theory. In J. Morse, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A., Clarke, J. Corbin, C. Porr, & P. Stern (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited (2nd ed., pp. 153–187). Routledge.
Charmaz, K., Thornberg, R., & Keane, E. (2018). Evolving grounded theory and social justice inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 411–443). Sage.
Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2018) ‘Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research’. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 5th ed. (pp. 29-71), Sage.
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124.
Flick, U. (2018). Doing grounded theory. Sage.
Giardina, M. D. (2024). In Celebration of Norman K. Denzin: Scholar, Teacher, Mentor, and Friend. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(5), 375-380.
Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2014). Memoing: A vital grounded theory procedure. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Aldine.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). Time for dying. Aldine.
Harris, G., & Keane, E. (2025). Inside out: Researcher positionality as insider and outsider and impact on the co-construction of data in a constructivist grounded theory study about teachers' understandings of intercultural education in Ireland. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 203-220). Routledge.
Kaufman, K., & Keane, E. (2025). Using constructivist grounded theory in a study of the career aspirations of children from diverse backgrounds in Ireland. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 83-99). Routledge.
Keane, E. (2011a). Distancing to self-protect: The perpetuation of inequality in higher education through socio-relational dis/engagement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(3), 449–466.
Keane, E. (2011b). Dependence-deconstruction: widening participation and traditional-entry students transitioning from school to higher education in Ireland. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 707-718.
Keane, E. (2012). Differential prioritising: Orientations to higher education and widening participation. International Journal of Educational Research, 53(12), 150–159.
Keane, E. (2015). Considering the practical implementation of constructivist grounded theory in a study of widening participation in Irish higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 415–431.
Keane, E. (2022a). Critical analytic memoing. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldana (Eds.), Analysing and interpreting qualitative data: After the Interview (pp. 259– 274). Sage.
Keane, E. (2022b). The legacy of Kathy Charmaz’s scholarship and mentorship: Enacting her constructivist principles through critically reflexive grounded theory practice. In A. Bryant, & A.E. Clarke (Eds.), Festschrift in honour of Kathy Charmaz (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 56, pp. 133–148). Emerald.
Keane, E. (2023). Chameleoning to fit in? Working class student teachers in Ireland performing differential social class identities in their placement schools. Educational Review, 77(1), 134-153.
Keane, E. (2024a). Finding moral value through maintaining a working class ‘mentality’: Student teachers from working class backgrounds (not) becoming middle class. Sociology, 58(2), 454-470.
Keane, E. (2024b). Not wanting to class or be classed: Student teachers in Ireland from working class backgrounds reflecting on class and class categorisations. Irish Journal of Sociology, 32(1-2), 186-204.
Keane, E., & Thornberg, R. (Eds.). (2025a). The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research. Routledge.
Keane, E., & Thornberg, R. (2025b). Grounded theory and constructivist grounded theory: History and development, in E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research. Routledge, 3-31.
Keane, E., & Thornberg, R. (2025c). Interrogating and addressing challenges and looking to the future of constructivist grounded theory in educational research, in E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research. Routledge, 361-378.
Kuhn, T. S (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press
Lempert, L. B. (2007). Asking questions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 245–264). Sage.
Loya, K. I. (2025). Developing a theoretical explanation of university teaching using constructivist grounded theory. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 302-319). Routledge.
Morse, J., Bowers, B., Clarke, A., Charmaz, K., Corbin, J., & Porr, C. (2021a). The maturation of grounded theory. In J. Morse, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. Clarke, J. Corbin, C. Porr, & P. Stern (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Routledge.
Morse, J., Bowers, B., Clarke, A., Charmaz, K., Corbin, J., & Porr, C. (2021b). The challenges to and future(s) of grounded theory. In J. Morse, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. Clarke, J. Corbin, C. Porr, & P. Stern (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited (2nd ed., pp. 289–320). Routledge.
Pezalla, A., Pettigrew, J., & Miller-Day, M. (2012). Researching the researcher-as-instrument: An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 165–185.
Schreiber, R., & Tomm-Bonde, L. (2015). Ubuntu and constructivist grounded theory: An African methodology package. Journal of Research in Nursing, 20(8), 655-664.
Selvik, S. (2025). A constructivist grounded theory approach to the school experiences of children living at refuges for abused women: Methodological challenges and possibilities. In E. Keane, & R. Thornberg, (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of constructivist grounded theory in educational research (pp. 65-82). Routledge.
Staller, K. M. (2023). The white light vibrations of Norman K. Denzin. Qualitative Social Work, 22(6), 1067-1072.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A. (1993). Continual permutations of action. Aldine
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Sage.
Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243– 259.
Thornberg, R. (2022). Abduction as a guiding principle in qualitative research design. In U. Flick (Ed.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 243– 256). Sage.
Thornberg, R. and Charmaz, K. (2012). Grounded theory. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, and F. J. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 41–67). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
Thornberg, R., and Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative analysis (pp. 153–169). London: Sage.
Thornberg, R., & Dunne, C. (2019). Literature review in grounded theory. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 206–221). Sage.
Thornberg, R., & Keane, E. (2022). Designing grounded theory studies. In U. Flick (Ed.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 452–466). Sage.
Similar Articles
- Jaqueline Silva Santos, Jeniffer Stephanie Marques Hilário, Raquel Dully Andrade, Débora Falleiros de Mello, Building Event History Calendar Domains: Methodological Elements of Constructivist Grounded Theory , New Trends in Qualitative Research: Vol. 8 (2021): Qualitative Research in Health: Advances and Challenges (Book Series)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.